[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Emacs-diffs] Changes to emacs/man/killing.texi
From: |
Richard M. Stallman |
Subject: |
[Emacs-diffs] Changes to emacs/man/killing.texi |
Date: |
Tue, 07 Feb 2006 23:54:35 +0000 |
Index: emacs/man/killing.texi
diff -u emacs/man/killing.texi:1.49 emacs/man/killing.texi:1.50
--- emacs/man/killing.texi:1.49 Sun Feb 5 22:41:30 2006
+++ emacs/man/killing.texi Tue Feb 7 23:54:35 2006
@@ -125,7 +125,7 @@
should be.
Why do we say ``or it should be''? When Emacs starts up using a
-window system, it determines automatically which key or keys should be
+graphical display, it determines automatically which key or keys should be
equivalent to @key{DEL}. As a result, @key{BACKSPACE} and/or @key{DELETE}
keys normally do the right things. But in some unusual cases Emacs
gets the wrong information from the system. If these keys don't do
@@ -264,7 +264,7 @@
@cindex Delete Selection mode
@cindex mode, Delete Selection
@findex delete-selection-mode
- Many window systems follow the convention that insertion while text
+ Many graphical applications follow the convention that insertion while text
is selected deletes the selected text. You can make Emacs behave this
way by enabling Delete Selection mode---with @kbd{M-x
delete-selection-mode} or using Custom. Another effect of this mode