emacs-diffs
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Emacs-diffs] Changes to emacs/lispref/searching.texi


From: Luc Teirlinck
Subject: [Emacs-diffs] Changes to emacs/lispref/searching.texi
Date: Sat, 11 Mar 2006 21:23:11 +0000

Index: emacs/lispref/searching.texi
diff -u emacs/lispref/searching.texi:1.70 emacs/lispref/searching.texi:1.71
--- emacs/lispref/searching.texi:1.70   Thu Mar  9 01:55:20 2006
+++ emacs/lispref/searching.texi        Sat Mar 11 21:23:11 2006
@@ -476,7 +476,7 @@
 should not quote these characters when they have no special meaning
 either.  This would not clarify anything, since backslashes can
 legitimately precede these characters where they @emph{have} special
-meaning, as in @code{[^\]} (@code{"[^\\]"} for Lisp string syntax),
+meaning, as in @samp{[^\]} (@code{"[^\\]"} for Lisp string syntax),
 which matches any single character except a backslash.
 
 In practice, most @samp{]} that occur in regular expressions close a
@@ -485,8 +485,8 @@
 @samp{[} and @samp{]}.  In such situations, it sometimes may be
 necessary to carefully parse the regexp from the start to determine
 which square brackets enclose a character alternative.  For example,
address@hidden consists of the complemented character alternative
address@hidden (which matches any single character that is not a square
address@hidden consists of the complemented character alternative
address@hidden (which matches any single character that is not a square
 bracket), followed by a literal @samp{]}.
 
 The exact rules are that at the beginning of a regexp, @samp{[} is




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]