emacs-diffs
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Emacs-diffs] Changes to emacs/admin/notes/copyright,v


From: Glenn Morris
Subject: [Emacs-diffs] Changes to emacs/admin/notes/copyright,v
Date: Sat, 03 Feb 2007 21:55:11 +0000

CVSROOT:        /cvsroot/emacs
Module name:    emacs
Changes by:     Glenn Morris <gm>       07/02/03 21:55:11

Index: copyright
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvsroot/emacs/emacs/admin/notes/copyright,v
retrieving revision 1.7
retrieving revision 1.8
diff -u -b -r1.7 -r1.8
--- copyright   3 Feb 2007 15:30:55 -0000       1.7
+++ copyright   3 Feb 2007 21:55:10 -0000       1.8
@@ -178,8 +178,8 @@
 admin/check-doc-strings
   Author is Martin Buchholz, but no assignment from him on file, and
   rms has no way to reach him.
-admin/make-announcement - no copyright
-admin/nt/makedist.bat - no copyright (author address@hidden mail sent)
+[FIXED  admin/make-announcement - no copyright]
+[FIXED  admin/nt/makedist.bat - no copyright]
 etc/ms-kermit - no copyright, but ms-7bkermit has one
 etc/e/eterm-color.ti  - no copyright
   rms: "I think that is not copyrightable under the merger doctrine
@@ -195,7 +195,7 @@
   probably be removed, but it may be ok (waiting for rms)
 
 
-[etc/orgcard.tex, orgcard.ps]
+[REMOVED etc/orgcard.tex, orgcard.ps]
   Re-add these files if an assignment is received from Rooke.
 
 
@@ -232,7 +232,7 @@
 
 msdos/is_exec.c, sigaction.c
   - do we need to add COPYING.LIB (because COPYING.DJ refers to it)?
-  relicense under the GPL?
+  can we relicense under the GPL? Do these contradict?
 
 
 oldXMenu/




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]