emacs-diffs
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Emacs-diffs] /srv/bzr/emacs/trunk r100338: * admin/notes/bzr: New file.


From: Glenn Morris
Subject: [Emacs-diffs] /srv/bzr/emacs/trunk r100338: * admin/notes/bzr: New file.
Date: Mon, 17 May 2010 19:52:21 -0700
User-agent: Bazaar (2.0.3)

------------------------------------------------------------
revno: 100338
committer: Glenn Morris <address@hidden>
branch nick: trunk
timestamp: Mon 2010-05-17 19:52:21 -0700
message:
  * admin/notes/bzr: New file.
  More mailing-list wisdom.  Probably should be merged with commits.
added:
  admin/notes/bzr
=== added file 'admin/notes/bzr'
--- a/admin/notes/bzr   1970-01-01 00:00:00 +0000
+++ b/admin/notes/bzr   2010-05-18 02:52:21 +0000
@@ -0,0 +1,32 @@
+NOTES ON COMMITTING TO EMACS'S BAZAAR REPO    -*- outline -*-
+
+* Install changes only on one branch, let them get merged elsewhere if needed.
+In particular, install bug-fixes only on the release branch (if there
+is one) and let them get synced to the trunk; do not install them by
+hand on the trunk as well.  E.g. if there is an active "emacs-23" branch
+and you have a bug-fix appropriate for the next Emacs-23.x release,
+install it only on the emacs-23 branch, not on the trunk as well.
+
+Installing things manually into more than one branch makes merges more
+difficult.
+
+http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/2010-03/msg01124.html
+
+* Backporting a bug-fix from the trunk to a branch (e.g. "emacs-23").
+Label the commit as a backport, e.g. by starting the commit message with
+"Backport:".  This is helpful for the person merging the release branch
+to the trunk.
+
+http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/2010-05/msg00262.html
+
+* Installing changes from your personal branches.
+If your branch has only a single commit, or many different real
+commits, it is fine to do a merge.  If your branch has only a very
+small number of "real" commits, but several "merge from trunks", it is
+preferred that you take your branch's diff, apply it to the trunk, and
+commit directly, not merge.  This keeps the history cleaner.
+
+Or use shelves; or rebase; or do something else.  See the thread for
+yet another fun excursion into the exciting world of version control.
+
+http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/2010-04/msg00086.html


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]