emacs-diffs
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Emacs-diffs] /srv/bzr/emacs/trunk r103494: * lisp/vc/vc-rcs.el: Remove


From: Glenn Morris
Subject: [Emacs-diffs] /srv/bzr/emacs/trunk r103494: * lisp/vc/vc-rcs.el: Remove some ancient comments.
Date: Wed, 02 Mar 2011 23:52:10 -0800
User-agent: Bazaar (2.0.3)

------------------------------------------------------------
revno: 103494
committer: Glenn Morris <address@hidden>
branch nick: trunk
timestamp: Wed 2011-03-02 23:52:10 -0800
message:
  * lisp/vc/vc-rcs.el: Remove some ancient comments.
  
  Anyone using rcs < 5.6.2 in 2011 probably has a functioning time
  machine, so does not need hand-holding.
modified:
  lisp/vc/vc-rcs.el
=== modified file 'lisp/vc/vc-rcs.el'
--- a/lisp/vc/vc-rcs.el 2011-01-26 08:36:39 +0000
+++ b/lisp/vc/vc-rcs.el 2011-03-03 07:52:10 +0000
@@ -25,14 +25,10 @@
 
 ;; See vc.el
 
-;; Some features will not work with old RCS versions.  Where
+;; Some features will not work with ancient RCS versions.  Where
 ;; appropriate, VC finds out which version you have, and allows or
-;; disallows those features (stealing locks, for example, works only
-;; from 5.6.2 onwards).
-;; Even initial checkins will fail if your RCS version is so old that ci
-;; doesn't understand -t-; this has been known to happen to people running
-;; NExTSTEP 3.0.
-;;
+;; disallows those features.
+
 ;; You can support the RCS -x option by customizing vc-rcs-master-templates.
 
 ;;; Code:
@@ -391,7 +387,7 @@
          (vc-rcs-set-default-branch file
                                     (if (vc-rcs-trunk-p new-version) nil
                                       (vc-branch-part new-version)))
-         ;; If this is an old RCS release, we might have
+         ;; If this is an old (pre-1992!) RCS release, we might have
          ;; to remove a remaining lock.
          (if (not (vc-rcs-release-p "5.6.2"))
              ;; exit status of 1 is also accepted.


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]