[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Emacs-diffs] /srv/bzr/emacs/trunk r103494: * lisp/vc/vc-rcs.el: Remove
From: |
Glenn Morris |
Subject: |
[Emacs-diffs] /srv/bzr/emacs/trunk r103494: * lisp/vc/vc-rcs.el: Remove some ancient comments. |
Date: |
Wed, 02 Mar 2011 23:52:10 -0800 |
User-agent: |
Bazaar (2.0.3) |
------------------------------------------------------------
revno: 103494
committer: Glenn Morris <address@hidden>
branch nick: trunk
timestamp: Wed 2011-03-02 23:52:10 -0800
message:
* lisp/vc/vc-rcs.el: Remove some ancient comments.
Anyone using rcs < 5.6.2 in 2011 probably has a functioning time
machine, so does not need hand-holding.
modified:
lisp/vc/vc-rcs.el
=== modified file 'lisp/vc/vc-rcs.el'
--- a/lisp/vc/vc-rcs.el 2011-01-26 08:36:39 +0000
+++ b/lisp/vc/vc-rcs.el 2011-03-03 07:52:10 +0000
@@ -25,14 +25,10 @@
;; See vc.el
-;; Some features will not work with old RCS versions. Where
+;; Some features will not work with ancient RCS versions. Where
;; appropriate, VC finds out which version you have, and allows or
-;; disallows those features (stealing locks, for example, works only
-;; from 5.6.2 onwards).
-;; Even initial checkins will fail if your RCS version is so old that ci
-;; doesn't understand -t-; this has been known to happen to people running
-;; NExTSTEP 3.0.
-;;
+;; disallows those features.
+
;; You can support the RCS -x option by customizing vc-rcs-master-templates.
;;; Code:
@@ -391,7 +387,7 @@
(vc-rcs-set-default-branch file
(if (vc-rcs-trunk-p new-version) nil
(vc-branch-part new-version)))
- ;; If this is an old RCS release, we might have
+ ;; If this is an old (pre-1992!) RCS release, we might have
;; to remove a remaining lock.
(if (not (vc-rcs-release-p "5.6.2"))
;; exit status of 1 is also accepted.
[Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- [Emacs-diffs] /srv/bzr/emacs/trunk r103494: * lisp/vc/vc-rcs.el: Remove some ancient comments.,
Glenn Morris <=