[Emacs-diffs] /srv/bzr/emacs/emacs-24 r110834: Formatting tweak for variables.texi

[Glenn Morris]

------------------------------------------------------------
revno: 110834
committer: Glenn Morris <address@hidden>
branch nick: emacs-24
timestamp: Sat 2012-11-10 16:20:51 -0800
message:
  Formatting tweak for variables.texi
  
  * doc/lispref/variables.texi (Adding Generalized Variables):
  Use standard formatting for common lisp note about setf functions.
modified:
  doc/lispref/ChangeLog
  doc/lispref/variables.texi

=== modified file 'doc/lispref/ChangeLog'
--- a/doc/lispref/ChangeLog     2012-11-07 15:46:35 +0000
+++ b/doc/lispref/ChangeLog     2012-11-11 00:20:51 +0000
@@ -1,3 +1,8 @@
+2012-11-11  Glenn Morris  <address@hidden>
+
+       * variables.texi (Adding Generalized Variables):
+       Use standard formatting for common lisp note about setf functions.
+
 2012-11-07  Martin Rudalics  <address@hidden>
 
        * elisp.texi (Top): Add Recombining Windows to menu.

=== modified file 'doc/lispref/variables.texi'
--- a/doc/lispref/variables.texi        2012-11-07 05:22:10 +0000
+++ b/doc/lispref/variables.texi        2012-11-11 00:20:51 +0000
@@ -2141,12 +2141,14 @@
 @end ignore
 
 @cindex CL note---no @code{setf} functions
-Common Lisp defines another way to specify the @code{setf} behavior of
-a function, namely address@hidden functions'', whose names are lists
address@hidden(setf @var{name})} rather than symbols.  For example,
address@hidden(defun (setf foo) @dots{})} defines the function that is used
-when @code{setf} is applied to @code{foo}.  Emacs does not support
-this.  It is a compile-time error to use @code{setf} on a form that
-has not already had an appropriate expansion defined.  In Common Lisp,
-this is not an error since the function @code{(setf @var{func})} might
-be defined later.
address@hidden
address@hidden Lisp note:} Common Lisp defines another way to specify the
address@hidden behavior of a function, namely address@hidden functions'',
+whose names are lists @code{(setf @var{name})} rather than symbols.
+For example, @code{(defun (setf foo) @dots{})} defines the function
+that is used when @code{setf} is applied to @code{foo}.  Emacs does
+not support this.  It is a compile-time error to use @code{setf} on a
+form that has not already had an appropriate expansion defined.  In
+Common Lisp, this is not an error since the function @code{(setf
address@hidden)} might be defined later.
address@hidden quotation