[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Emacs-diffs] master 168c80e: gnus-registry.el: Correct function argumen
From: |
Katsumi Yamaoka |
Subject: |
[Emacs-diffs] master 168c80e: gnus-registry.el: Correct function argument order |
Date: |
Sat, 11 Jul 2015 23:48:39 +0000 |
branch: master
commit 168c80efdc3981ffbc6ee731e7681b0386eb1db2
Author: Eric Abrahamsen <address@hidden>
Commit: Katsumi Yamaoka <address@hidden>
gnus-registry.el: Correct function argument order
* lisp/gnus/gnus-registry.el (gnus-registry--set/remove-mark):
Reverse the order of function arguments.
---
lisp/gnus/gnus-registry.el | 2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/lisp/gnus/gnus-registry.el b/lisp/gnus/gnus-registry.el
index f73f216..0cb5960 100644
--- a/lisp/gnus/gnus-registry.el
+++ b/lisp/gnus/gnus-registry.el
@@ -881,7 +881,7 @@ FUNCTION should take two parameters, a mark symbol and the
cell value."
;; FIXME: Why not merge gnus-registry--set/remove-mark and
;; gnus-registry-set-article-mark-internal?
-(defun gnus-registry--set/remove-mark (remove mark articles)
+(defun gnus-registry--set/remove-mark (mark remove articles)
"Set/remove the MARK over process-marked ARTICLES."
;; If this is called and the user doesn't want the
;; registry enabled, we'll ask anyhow.
[Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- [Emacs-diffs] master 168c80e: gnus-registry.el: Correct function argument order,
Katsumi Yamaoka <=