Re: [Orgmode] Another GTD question.

[Xiao-Yong Jin]

Carsten Dominik <address@hidden> writes:

> On Oct 22, 2006, at 2:39, Eddward DeVilla wrote:
>
>> ... but I don't know one aspect of Org that I hope is maintained.
>> It's really flexible.  Kind of like perl.  It has a lot of little
>> nifty features that you can use to manage and organize information (to
>> tasks, or whatever) and use can use any subset you want.  You can
>> learn it incrementally.  (...as I have.  It sound popular but I
>> haven't even touched the publishing...)  None of the features really
>> require the use of any other feature except maybe agenda and agenda is
>> just a flexible interface for gathering the information marked and
>> managed by the other features.  (Dates, tags, Todo state...)  Yet all
>> of the features work well together.  There's more that one way to do
>> most things.
>
> I am smiling happily at this description, it reflects very much of
> what I am trying to do with org-mode.
>
> - Carsten

I'm wondering if you could absorb all the nifty features from
emacs-muse or planner, etc.  Especially various export formats and
more text markups?

Xiao-Yong
-- 
       ,,,
      (o o)
---ooO-(_)-Ooo---