[Orgmode] Problem with ascii export + possible useful search.

[Tim O'Callaghan]

On 19/06/07, Carsten Dominik <address@hidden> wrote:
> On Jun 15, 2007, at 15:26, Tim O'Callaghan wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > It seems that under Xemacs the ascii export just appends the new
> > export to the contents of the old export. If you have the old export
> > buffer open already then it inserts the new export into the old file
> > at the cursor.
>
> I am not able to reproduce this.  Anyone?

After some more investigation, i think it has to do with the
buffer/file not being erased before the ascii is rendered. It works
for html export, it does not for txt export. Not sure why this should
be, the code i looked at seems to try to clear the buffer.

Latest org mode, Xemacs for windows native: 21.4 (patch 19) \"Constant
Variable\" XEmacs Lucid

> > The useful search i have started using, is similar to the GTD stuck
> > projects one. The search produces a view of stuck to-dos. That is a
> > list of todos that have been designated without a context. At the
> > moment i am using something like this in my
> > org-agenda-custom-commands:
> > ("-" tags-todo
> > "address@hidden@address@hidden@address@hidden@address@hidden@-
> > address@hidden@address@hidden@address@hidden@address@hidden@
> > address@hidden@/X"
> > nil "")
> >
> > where "X" is what i use to denote a TODO entry.
>
> Nice!  Does this contain all your tags, or only a selection?
> You might be able to write this using a regular expression.

only a selection. I use 5 groups of tags for active projects.
The first group just contains @proj - the active projcet tag. This  is
used with the second group <@home|@work> which are inherited by all of
the active projects in the two huge org files i use for home and work.
The last three groups are generally @<physical context group> ,
<activity context group>@, and <possible duration context>@ which i
combine depending on the task.

I did think of a regular expression, the docs mention its possible,and
give a small example, but i  couldn't get it to do what i wanted
straight away, and didn't want to spend the time figuring it out. I
considered suggesting a group name/selection type, but it seemed a bit
fiddly.

Tim.