On Sat, Jul 28, 2007 at 12:17:06PM +0100, Leo wrote:
(info "(org)Multiple sets in one file")
| `C-S-<right>'
| `C-S-<left>'
| These keys jump from one TODO subset to the next. In the above
| example, `C-S-<right>' would jump from `TODO' or `DONE' to
| `REPORT', and any of the words in the second row to `CANCELED'.
These key bindings are to move from one set of the TODO items to
another, which intuitively are a vertical motion. See this configure:
| (setq org-todo-keywords
| '((sequence "TODO" "|" "DONE")
| (sequence "REPORT" "BUG" "KNOWNCAUSE" "|" "FIXED")
| (sequence "|" "CANCELED")))
I would propose to change these key bindings to:
C-S-<up/down>
Agreed, this is more logical, although the modified cursor key
bindings are always going to be contended. Personally I have a
"global" standard set of key bindings for outline navigation and
editing which applies across several modes: folding-mode, org-mode,
outline-minor-mode (and allout), orgstruct-mode. Having to remember
different bindings for how to hide/reveal/zoom to a subtree in each
mode is a nightmare. I would love to see some standardization here
with more mode authors talking to each other.
On a related topic, if I have S-{left,right} on my org-disputed-keys
list, this breaks using them for changing a timestamp by one-day
increments, even though I don't consider that a clashing binding. I
guess I am arguing that this is a minor bug with `org-key' being too
indiscriminate in when it filters bindings.