[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Orgmode] Not not using GTD
From: |
Dmitri Minaev |
Subject: |
[Orgmode] Not not using GTD |
Date: |
Tue, 28 Aug 2007 14:21:39 +0500 |
In the last year, I tried a couple of times to adopt the GTD planning
style. Until now, I was not successful, mainly due to my own inability
to keep the records up to date. Two weeks ago I gave another try and,
as before, I felt the initial relief that comes with getting rid of
the necessity to keep everything in mind. My org-mode setup is very
close to what Carsten described in Another GTD Question thread [1]:
tags for contexts, todo keywords for task state, outlines for pretty
everything else. Scheduling and deadlines make the standard agenda
view an amazing tool. Someday/Maybe lists simply have no todo state. I
have yet to explore the ways of dealing with projects.
There are, however, some things I might want to do, but either don't
know how or still not sure if I should.
* WAITING states in agenda
I really love the standard agenda view, but the list of currently
open todo items includes all unfinished entries, including waiting
tasks. To exclude them, I can define a custom agenda, but I would
prefer to customize the standard view, though, to replace the huge
"open todo items" list with a slightly more compact list of selected
todo-states. Is there a way to do so?
How do you prefer to see your waiting items -- in the same list with
other todos or in a separate list?
* Inherited tags in agenda
The inherited tags are not shown in the agenda. It would be OK if I
were careful enough to tag all new entries. Now, as soon as I see an
untagged item in the agenda, I am tempted to check if it belongs to
a tagged upper level or I have simply forgotten to tag it. Is it
possible to show the inherited tags in the agenda?
* Projects
How do you manage your projects? Are they in separate file(s)? If
you use a separate file for every project, how do you make sure you
don't forget any -- put links somewhere or add them to the list of
agenda files or use the PigPog method [2] or what?
* Review
What is the best review technique? Using agenda or simply opening
all files and re-reading them?
[1] http://article.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.orgmode/715
[2] http://pigpog.com/node/1031
--
With best regards,
Dmitri Minaev
Russian history blog: http://minaev.blogspot.com
- [Orgmode] Not not using GTD,
Dmitri Minaev <=