Bastien <address@hidden> writes:
Richard G Riley <address@hidden> writes:
Hey you mentionned in your first email that the manual
explicitely said
the two sets should have different keywords, so "bug" is a bit
too much
here :-)
You misunderstand. When you try to switch it says "1/2" but wont
switch. It should not recognise the second if you cant switch to
it I
think.
So your proposal is to ignore the second set if it is not well
defined?
Yes. I was confused for a while as to why I couldn't select the second
set. Or maybe no. But let the user know why they cant be used.
It might be even better to really allow the selection. The next state
change must be preceeded by a sequence selection each and every
time if
you are not wanting to use the default (first) sequence. That would
make
sense to me too.
Maybe this would be even more confusing for the user: having 1/2
in the
echo-area and not being able to get 2/2 makes you wonder what is
wrong
with the second set... what you precisely did. If the second set is
simply ignored, then the user will be tempted to make Org know about
it rather than fixing it.
Would you use this?
Probably not as my initial query was more interest than anything
else
:-)
and I don't know what TYP_TODO is off the top of my head:-;
Org used to handle the cycling through SEQ_TODO and TYP_TODO keywords
differently -- looks like it's not the case anymore...
_______________________________________________
Emacs-orgmode mailing list
Remember: use `Reply All' to send replies to the list.
address@hidden
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode