emacs-orgmode
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Orgmode] Re: DocBook exporter code (version 1.0)


From: Carsten Dominik
Subject: Re: [Orgmode] Re: DocBook exporter code (version 1.0)
Date: Mon, 9 Mar 2009 07:25:23 +0100

Hi Baoqui,

thank you very much for creating this exporter, and for contributing
it to Org.

Do you have a copyright assignment with the FSF that would cover Org- mode?
If not, would you be willing to sign one?  This will give us the freedom
to add the file to Emacs at some point.

Another small issue:  Any files that go into Emacs must,
in order to be consistent with the old 8+3 DOS file names,
be unique names within the first 8 characters.  Even though
I like org-export-docbook as a name, I think we need to call it
org-docbook.el.  At least that gives you the option to do
more things with docbook besides export, should you want to.

Maybe we should rename org-export-latex to org-latex, for consistency,
but this is hard after such a long time.

- Carsten


On Mar 9, 2009, at 5:46 AM, Baoqiu Cui wrote:

Hi Carsten,

Carsten Dominik <address@hidden> writes:

Hi Baoqui,

thanks for the link to the code.

Forgive me for so far staying quiet on this subject.  When you
first posted the announcement, I had some mixed feelings.

No problem at all.  This is totally understandable.

First of all, I don't really know docbook, and I have never used it.

Then:

One of the really weak features in Org's design is that exporting is not implemented in a generic way. All exporters share a preprocessing step that turns Org format into something a little more sane and consistent.
Then each exporter goes its own way.  This setup makes maintenance
sort of a nightmare, because each change to Org syntax needs to be
implemented in all exporters separately.  ...

Yes, it would be nice to have a generic exporting framework in Org.
When I just started working on the DocBook exporter, I tried to follow
org-export-latex.el first but hit some limitation in org-list-to- generic after a short time. Then I switched to the style of org-export-as- html,
and found its line-based exporting very easy to use.

... Maybe you have read my
swearing when I was trying to fix the LaTeX exporter which I did
not understand completely at first - it was written by Bastien.

I haven't read about this, but I can imagine what kind of difficulty you
might have...

I had really hoped that the next step in exporting Org would be
to rewrite the exporter from scratch, in a generic way, that will
then make supporting different formatters more stable and easy.
Adding a new exporter does not get us closer to that idea.

Agreed. If Org documents can be parsed into tree representations by the
generic exporter, and each individual exporter only needs to configure
the tags (or formatting methods) for all components in the tree, writing
different exporters would be much easier.  Not sure if this can be
easily done in Org.

And I had feared that your exporter would be a badly hacked
attempt reinventing lots of wheels, that could never become a really
complete export.

I have misjudged severely, the exporter you made looks quite complete,
you have based it very heavily on the XHTML exporter and in this way
it seems to be able to handle the entire Org syntax, if I see
correctly.  ...

Yes, DocBook exporter is heavily based on the XHTML exporter.  Both
exporters shares a lot of processing, but differ at other areas.  Some
internal functions used by these two exporters could be merged in the
future.

... So I have now made the changes you require in org-exp.el,
and I would like to include the exporter, once you are satisfied,
into our contrib directory or even, depending on copyright assignment,
into the core.

Thanks a lot for making the changes in org-exp.el!  I've removed the
modified version of org-exp.el from my repository on Google Code. I'll try to do more testing (including testing it on XEmacs) and incorporate any comments that other people may have before you can put this exporter
into Org release.

However, I need to make clear that I have no time to maintain another
exporter, so I would hope that you would be willing to to the necessary
work to keep it up to date and working.

I won't have any problem with maintaining this exporter.

Thanks,
Baoqiu


Best wishes

- Carsten

On Mar 8, 2009, at 6:10 AM, Baoqiu Cui wrote:

Hi,

I just posted the code for DocBook exporter to Google Code.  You can
use
the following link to get access to the code and example files:

http://code.google.com/p/bcui-emacs/source/browse/#svn/trunk/org-
docbook

Here is the README:
= =
= = ====================================================================
#
# File: org-docbook/README
#
# $Id$
#

This is the DocBook exporter for Org-mode, a tool written in Emacs
Lisp
to export text files written in Org-mode to DocBook.

This directory contains:

README
  This file.

org-export-docbook.el
  The main part of DocBook exporter code.

org-exp.el
  Slightly modified version of file org-exp.el that is part of
  Org-mode.  Currently this file is synced up with Org-mode 6.24.

test.org
  An Org file used for testing.  It includes all the features that
  current version of DocBook exporter supports.

test.xml
  DocBook XML file exported from test.org.

test.pdf
  PDF file generated from DocBook XML file test.xml.

If you have any comments on how to improve this exporter, please send
email to cbaoqiu AT yahoo DOT com.

= =
= = ====================================================================

You are welcome to try this out, and give me any comments you may
have.
Bug reports and ideas on how to improve this will be highly
appreciated.

Thanks,
Baoqiu



_______________________________________________
Emacs-orgmode mailing list
Remember: use `Reply All' to send replies to the list.
address@hidden
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]