emacs-orgmode
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Orgmode] Re: Patch to fix two bugs in HTML/DocBook exporters


From: Baoqiu Cui
Subject: [Orgmode] Re: Patch to fix two bugs in HTML/DocBook exporters
Date: Wed, 08 Apr 2009 22:27:58 -0700
User-agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.3 (darwin)

Carsten Dominik <address@hidden> writes:

>> 1. Bug One: two consecutive lists with different list types at the
>> same
>>   level are exported as *one* list.  For example, the following two
>>   lists
>>
>>   1. Ordered List Item 1
>>   2. Ordered List Item 2
>>
>>   - Itemized List Item 1
>>   - Itemized List Item 2
>>   - Itemized List Item 3
>
> This is, actually, not a bug but on purpose.
> List boundaries are set by indentation, and the
> list type is set by the first item.  I prefer to keep it that way.
> In the same way, the actual numbers in an ordered list are ignored
> and the list is renumbered on export.

Thanks for the explanation, Carsten!  This makes perfect sense to me.
No wonder I found the same "problem" in function
`org-beginning-of-item-list'. :-)

If a lot of people like to mix different list types together in the way
I showed above, I would prefer that Org mode has finer support for this.
But for now, I think we should keep the existing way.

>> 2. Bug Two: a paragraph *immediately* after a block like quote, verse,
>>   centered block, example, etc. is not wrapped into paragraph tags
>>   (<p>...</p> in HTML or <para>...</para> in DocBook).  While it is
>> not
>>   a big deal for HTML exporter, this bug makes exported DocBook XML
>>   document invalid.
>>
>>   The following lines can reproduce this bug:
>>
>>   : Code line one
>>   : Code line two
>>   This is a paragraph immediately after the above code block without
>> an
>>   empty line before it, and it is NOT wrapped in a paragraph (<p> in
>>   HTML or <para> in DocBook) in exported format.
>>
>> Please let me know if you see any problems in the fix.
>
> I would like to fix this bug, and if you send me a patch just
> for this, I'd be happy to apply it.

OK.  I am attaching the new patch at the end.

Thanks,
Baoqiu

Attachment: para-after-block.diff
Description: Text Data


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]