emacs-orgmode
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Babel] [Orgmode] Strange bug in org-babel with python


From: Darlan Cavalcante Moreira
Subject: Re: [Babel] [Orgmode] Strange bug in org-babel with python
Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2009 23:58:15 -0300
User-agent: Wanderlust/2.15.6 (Almost Unreal) Emacs/23.1 Mule/6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO)

Hi Dan,

Thank you for the solution and specially for the explanation.  The
real problem was not understanding what was wrong. But with the
explanation in the other thread (that you also added in worg) thinks
make sense now.

- Darlan


At Wed, 11 Nov 2009 19:44:34 -0500,
Dan Davison <address@hidden> wrote:
> 
> Darlan Cavalcante Moreira <address@hidden> writes:
> 
> > Hello org-users,
> >
> > Today I was bitten by a weird behavior when executing some python
> > blocks with org-babel that really confused me, but after some trying
> > and error I was able to isolate the problem.
> >
> > When a block has an import statement such as
> > ,----
> > | from some_module import *
> > `----
> > it works with :results output, but not with :results value.
> 
> Hi Darlan,
> 
> Thanks for your helpful observations in this thread and the other
> one. I'm fairly happy with the solution we've arrived at, but the
> example you give above actually still won't work in :result value
> non-session. The reason is that in that scenario (and only that one), in
> order to compute the value of the block, org-babel wraps the code in a
> function and evaluates that function.
> 
> So the rules are now: in ':results value' non-session mode, you have to
> write code that is valid inside a function, and it seems that in python
> that is not true for
> 
> from some_module import *
> 
> I only learned this when studying your post. It seems that it's just the
> import * which is a problem; explicitly importing individual components
> or named modules is fine. So unless anyone knows better, I guess the
> answer is, Don't Do That :)
> 
> There's a working version of your example below that avoids import *,
> with the new necessary 'return' statements added.
> 
> Dan
> 
> 
> --------------------------------------------------------
> * dc
> #+begin_src python :tangle test :results silent
>   def double_input(a):
>       return a*2
> #+end_src
> 
> #+begin_src python :results value
>   import test
>   
>   def times_four(a):
>       return test.double_input(a)*2
>   
>   if __name__ == '__main__':
>       print "Value is %s" % times_four(10)
>       return times_four(10)
> #+end_src
> 
> #+resname:
> : 40
> 
> 
> #+begin_src python :results value
>   from test import double_input
>   
>   def times_four(a):
>       return double_input(a)*2
>   
>   if __name__ == '__main__':
>       print "Value is %s" % times_four(10)
>       return times_four(10)
> #+end_src
> 
> #+resname:
> : 40
> --------------------------------------------------------
> 
> 
> 
> >
> > The content of simple file to reproduce the problem is showed below
> >
> > --------------- Cut here -----------------------------------
> > * Test Org-babel
> >
> > #+begin_src python :tangle test :results silent
> >   def double_input(a):
> >       return a*2
> > #+end_src
> >
> > #+begin_src python :results value
> >   import test
> >   
> >   def times_four(a):
> >       return test.double_input(a)*2
> >   
> >   if __name__ == '__main__':
> >       print "Value is %s" % times_four(10)
> >       times_four(10)
> > #+end_src
> >
> > #+begin_src python :results value
> >   from test import *
> >   
> >   def times_four(a):
> >       return double_input(a)*2
> >   
> >   if __name__ == '__main__':
> >       print "Value is %s" % times_four(10)
> >       times_four(10)
> > #+end_src
> > --------------- End of cut ---------------------------------
> >
> > To reproduce the problem, tangle the file to create test.py from the
> > first block. Then executing the second block (which has no import *)
> > works with either :results output or :results value.
> >
> > However, the third block, (which uses import *) only works if executed
> > with :results output. I can't see the reason for this since the code
> > is right and works in a python buffer as expected.
> >
> > - Darlan
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Emacs-orgmode mailing list
> > Remember: use `Reply All' to send replies to the list.
> > address@hidden
> > http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]