[Orgmode] Re: Sending org-mode nodes

[lukasz . stelmach]

Sebastian Rose <address@hidden> writes:
> address@hidden writes:
>> David Maus <address@hidden> writes:
> //....//
>>     - Message-ID derived from node's ID. This would be quite useful for
>>       associating replies with original notes/nodes.
>
>
> In that case, each mail sent from the subtree would have the same
> message-ID, which is invalid, since the ID is made to identify a certain
> email. It's supposed to be world wide unique for at least two years.
>
> Your provider would replace your (probably invalid) ID anyway.

I've written *derived* which means
org-<ID>-<current-time>-<user-mail-address> also fits. Right?

>> These are of course my whishful thoughts, especially the one with
>> Old-Sent-To. I think, however, that org-mode with them implemented would
>> be even greater tool than it is today.
>
>
> I believe it's not implemented, because it's easy to just
>
>   C-c @
>   C-x m
>   Enter addresses (bbdb helps a lot here)
>   DOWN DOWN DOWN DOWN
>   C-y
>   evtl. edit the contents
>   C-c C-C

Which only proves that it is possible to do it automatically.

> There's simply no need to implement it for Gnus users.
> Emacs+Org+bbdb+Gnus implement it already.

How about attachments? How, at least, to get their full paths into kill
ring? Wether we like it or *not* some things can't be done in pure
text/plain.

Putting a headline as a subject (with or without tags) makes it even
better as well as stripping any drawers (leading stars?). From the very
beginning I assumed there is a way of doing what I need just right now
but I described some enhancements that make work even less
troublesome. Imagine:

  C-c C-x m (org-send-node e.g.)
  C-c C-c

would be possible for a well prepared node (bbdb link stored as a
property). What makes nodesending even more appealing to me is that I
can have my emails (at least some of them) well organized with org (and
git) and attached to other things I do.

-- 
Miłego dnia,
Łukasz Stelmach