On Fri, Apr 9, 2010 at 12:41 PM, Eric Schulte
<address@hidden> wrote:
Setup
org-mime exposes two functions
- `org-mime-htmlize'
-
can be called from within a mail composition
buffer to export either the entire buffer or just the active
region to html, and embed the results into the buffer as a
text/html mime section.
org-mime-htmlize is an interactive Lisp function in `org-mime.el'.
(org-mime-htmlize ARG)
Export a portion of an email body composed using `mml-mode' to
html using `org-mode'. If called with an active region only
export that region, otherwise export the entire body.
- `org-mime-org-buffer-htmlize'
-
can be called from within an
Org-mode buffer to export either the whole buffer or the narrowed
subtree or active region to HTML, and open a new email buffer
including the resulting HTML content as an embedded mime section.
org-mime-org-buffer-htmlize is an interactive Lisp function in
`org-mime.el'.
(org-mime-org-buffer-htmlize)
Export the current org-mode buffer to HTML using
`org-export-as-html' and package the results into an email
handling with appropriate MIME encoding.
The following key bindings are suggested, which bind the C-c M-o key
sequence to the appropriate org-mime function in both email and
Org-mode buffers.
(add-hook 'message-mode-hook
(lambda ()
(local-set-key "\C-c\M-o" 'org-mime-htmlize)))
(add-hook 'org-mode-hook
(lambda ()
(local-set-key "\C-c\M-o" 'org-mime-org-buffer-htmlize)))
Just quickly -- so if I'm using wanderlust, will the resultant message still be properly formatted? I remember there was some discussion about the separation syntax in different mailers but don'tremember how it turned out. thanks for this -- man, does it look good in html!
matt