[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Orgmode] Embedding org-syntax in program source
From: |
Dan Davison |
Subject: |
Re: [Orgmode] Embedding org-syntax in program source |
Date: |
Wed, 14 Apr 2010 11:22:47 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1.50 (gnu/linux) |
LanX <address@hidden> writes:
> Hi Dan
>
>
>
> Right. Given the present forum I presume you are using emacs, so that
> shouldn't be a problem per se?
>
>
> Well, don't you think that telling other people that changing the
> _source_-code
> requires emacs might be a problem?
Hi Rolf,
Yes I agree that this is something to think about. I mean, obviously
*they* can change it easily, but incorporating their edits to tangled
output back into your (version-controlled) source org file isn't so
easy.
Best wishes,
Dan
>
>
>
> I think you may have formed an inaccurate idea of how people are working
> with source code in org-mode.
>
>
> maybe... and I have to admit my knowledge of LP is theoretical (but at least I
> investigated the sources of TeX long ago! :)
>
> my idea for the beginning was to extend my codes with org-modes folding,
> linking and some TODO features in perl comments. Maybe automatically switching
> the mode when the cursor is entering/leaving comments.
>
> Multiline wouldn't be a problem since I can include them in POD (perl's
> simplified approach to LP)
>
> or I could embrace them in heredocs, for instance the following is legal
> perlcode as long as the last line is empty (no whitespaces allowed).
>
> <<;
> * block1
> ** [test] bla
>
>
>
> > And relying on an extra step for code generation is dangerous...
>
> You would have to explain that assertion.
>
>
> Sorry, no offence intended, this is the common sense of perlmonks when talking
> about run time code generation and adding extra dependencies. (Maybe not the
> appropriate slang here...)
>
> I wouldn't find many to join my projects when relying on extra make files and
> I
> suppose running emacs in batch mode to tangle the code is not that stable.
>
>> This is for sure acceptable with elisp or multilanguage projects.
>
>
> I didn't understand this.
>
>
> emacs is a natural habitat of elisp , like unix is one for C.
>
> And multilanguage projects would naturally rely on some make mechanisms.
>
>
>
>
> > PS: I forgot to mention that when switching to other modes the
> highlighting
> > will also get confused and fly-make will report plenty of syntax
> problems.
>
> I'm not sure what you mean here. When working with code in org-mode, one
> uses C-c ' to switch to a language major-mode buffer containing the body
> of the source code block. Is that working OK for you?
>
>
> hm, yes ...but if I do this I could equally embrace all org-mode-stuff in
> between "=pod"-lines or prepend a # to each line when switching to cperl-mode.
>
> Hooking this to save would guaranty to always have legal perlcode...
>
> bye
> Rolf
- [Orgmode] Embedding org-syntax in program source, LanX, 2010/04/13
- Re: [Orgmode] Embedding org-syntax in program source, Eric Schulte, 2010/04/13
- Message not available
- [Orgmode] Embedding org-syntax in program source, LanX, 2010/04/13
- Re: [Orgmode] Embedding org-syntax in program source, Eric Schulte, 2010/04/13
- Re: [Orgmode] Embedding org-syntax in program source, Dan Davison, 2010/04/13
- Re: [Orgmode] Embedding org-syntax in program source, LanX, 2010/04/14
- Re: [Orgmode] Embedding org-syntax in program source, Sebastian Rose, 2010/04/14
- Re: [Orgmode] Embedding org-syntax in program source,
Dan Davison <=
Re: [Orgmode] Embedding org-syntax in program source, Dan Davison, 2010/04/13