Re: [Orgmode] Export to html

[Sebastian Rose]

Nick Dokos <address@hidden> writes:
> Thomas S. Dye <address@hidden> wrote:
>
>> Aloha all,
>> 
>> On the bus this morning I was able to find out a bit more about
>> problems with html export.
>> 
>> Using Bernt's minimal.emacs and exporting to html with C-c C-e H, git
>> bisect says:
>> 
>> 459d99c44c7df4cd09d82fa54c53e5d5eec47a4e is the first bad commit
>> commit 459d99c44c7df4cd09d82fa54c53e5d5eec47a4e
>> Author: Tom Breton (Tehom) <address@hidden>
>> Date:   Mon May 17 18:17:38 2010 -0400
>> 
>>     Moved to new branch
>> 
>> Prior to this commit file links are exported like this:
>> 
>> <a href="index.pdf">file:index.pdf</a>
>> 
>> After the commit, file links are exported like this:
>> 
>> <a href="file:index.pdf">index.pdf</a>
>> 
>> I was a bit surprised at the git bisect result because I understood
>> Tom Breton (Tehom) to be working on a testing framework, rather than
>> html export.  So, I ran through git bisect a second time and got
>> identical results.
>> 
>> I hope I've understood the procedure correctly and that this
>> information is useful.  At this point, I'm in way over my head and
>> won't be able to do more without specific instructions.
>> 
>> I'm currently using commit d56d417bc214088114e10c959ce78bee2d26635d on
>> the master branch to make my exporting and publishing setup work as
>> expected.




In the current Org-mode's version this should be fixed.
Carsten pushed a fix yesterday.




> Tom,
>
> I can't reproduce the busted link. With more-or-less-current Org-mode
> (version 6.36trans (release_6.36.102.g67b5)), the link looks like this:
>
>     <a href="foo.pdf">foo.pdf</a>
>
> Reverting the commit you identified (the revert was not clean: I had to
> resolve a merge conflict by hand - a dicey proposition, particularly in
> this situation where I have no idea what the patch is trying to do)
> gives me:
>
>     <a href="foo.pdf">file:foo.pdf</a>
>
> That's with your minimal.emacs for the other problem you've identified
> (changed to produce html of course). So it looks like the patch cleaned
> up the link name in this case.
>
> Nick
>
> PS. I also looked at the commit: I gave up on figuring it out in any
> reasonable time, but I must say the commit comment is no help.



  Sebastian