emacs-orgmode
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Orgmode] Re: clocktable: maximum level 0 does not only avoid listing it


From: Carsten Dominik
Subject: [Orgmode] Re: clocktable: maximum level 0 does not only avoid listing items but also does not calculate items
Date: Thu, 22 Jul 2010 09:47:05 +0200


On Jul 22, 2010, at 9:16 AM, Rainer Stengele wrote:

Am 21.07.2010 16:24, schrieb Carsten Dominik:

On Jul 13, 2010, at 11:21 AM, Rainer Stengele wrote:

Hi all!

lately I use the marvelous clocktables a lot...

For toplevel clocktables which just sum up "all" I use ":maxlevel 0"

The manual reads

:maxlevel Maximum level depth to which times are listed in the table.

which I misunderstood.
I understood: an unlisted item does not mean that its time is not added!
But it looks like ":maxlevel 0" does not add everything up.


I cannot reproduce this, :maxlevel 0 works for me.


Ok, maybe the manual is a bit misleading here.



How can I get a clocktable without any details which simply adds up everything in the scope?

BTW, the ":stepskip0" parameter does not seem to be included in the manual.

It is in the manual.

- Carsten


Rainer





Carsten,

maybe I misunderstood.


1. Without maxlevbel I get I get

#+BEGIN: clocktable :scope ("file1.org" "file2") :timestamp t :tstart "<2010-05-01 Sa 00:00>" :tend "<2010-07-31 Sa 23:55>"
Clock summary at [2010-07-22 Do 09:07]

| File | L | Timestamp | Headline | Time | | | |-------------------+---+---------------------+---------------- +----------+--------+--------| | | | Timestamp | *Total time* | *327:51* | | |
...



with :maxlevel 0 I get


#+BEGIN: clocktable :maxlevel 0 :scope ("file1.org" "file2") :timestamp t :tstart "<2010-05-01 Sa 00:00>" :tend "<2010-07-31 Sa 23:55>"
Clock summary at [2010-07-22 Do 09:11]

| File | L | Timestamp | Headline     | Time     |
|------+---+-----------+--------------+----------|
|      |   | Timestamp | *Total time* | *232:17* |
|------+---+-----------+--------------+----------|
#+END:


I would like to get the same results!

Indeed, this looks wrong.

Unfortunately I don't have time to look at this before my vacation (starting tomorrow....) :(
Please remind me when I get back.

- Carsten

Is ":maxlevel 0" intended to not include the sublevel clocks?
If not how can I debug this?


- Rainer

- Carsten






reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]