[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Orgmode] Re: [Babel] Need for an extra literal block construct
From: |
Dan Davison |
Subject: |
[Orgmode] Re: [Babel] Need for an extra literal block construct |
Date: |
Sun, 21 Nov 2010 10:01:24 +0000 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1 (gnu/linux) |
Hi Seb,
What I was trying to say is that with bug reports it is helpful if the
first one or two sentences of the email are a precise and brief
statement of what is going wrong. Then the reader can decide if she
wants to continue to the more detailed and discursive material.
Dan
Sébastien Vauban <address@hidden>
writes:
> Hi Dan,
>
> Dan Davison wrote:
>> In addition to the Org example, would you mind supplying a concise, explicit
>> statement of what the putative bug is? With just the Org example on its own,
>> the bug is implicit and I at least feel that I'm having to work hard to get
>> there!
>
> Hope this helps!
>
> #+TITLE: ecm-verse-2.txt
> #+DATE: 2010-11-20
> #+LANGUAGE: en_US
>
> #+LaTeX_CLASS: mcarticle
> #+LaTeX_CLASS_OPTIONS: [final]
>
> * Context
>
> There are clearly 3 key "concepts" to be able to distinguish in nice HTML
> output:
>
> - Code fragments :: text files that use the specific numbers of spaces and
> characters to line things up.
>
> - Sample output :: Output from programs, scripts or commands.
>
> - Text giving instructions :: Typically used for quoting passages of an email
> message.
>
> * Examples
>
> ** Code fragment
>
> #+begin_src emacs-lisp
> (update this-var)
> (echo "OK")
> #+end_src
>
> ** Sample output
>
> The results of code execution is currently (or /was/ -- I need to test the
> patch of Eric) translated into HTML as EXAMPLE.
>
> #+begin_src sh :results output :exports both
> ls *.org
> #+end_src
>
> #+results:
> | Agenda-Sorting-Strategy.org |
> | Clock-Report.org |
> | org-beamer-fpu-rules.org |
> | org-hist.org |
>
> ** Text giving instructions
>
> EXAMPLE begin taken, if I want another "verbatim" environment, the only left
> to me, in HTML, is VERSE.
>
> #+begin_verse
> Hi Seb,
>
> In addition to the Org example, would you mind supplying a concise,
> explicit statement of what the putative bug is? With just the Org
> example on its own:
>
> - the bug is implicit and
> - I at least feel that I'm having to work hard to get there!
>
> Dan
> #+end_verse
>
>
> From [[http://mid.gmane.org/87mxp5q6uf.fsf%40gmail.com][Email from Dan
> Davison: Re: {Babel} Need for an extra ]]
>
> *I'd expect to see all the above passage from the email to be uninterpreted*.
> It
> is not acting that way.
>
> See attachment for what I'm heading to.
>
>
>> p.s. However, your emails did motivate the following trivial function a
>> few months ago which I now use every day for various purposes.
>>
>> (defun dan/switch-to-org-scratch ()
>> "Switch to a temp Org buffer.
>> If the region is active, insert it."
>> (interactive)
>> (let ((contents
>> (and (region-active-p)
>> (buffer-substring (region-beginning)
>> (region-end)))))
>> (find-file "/tmp/org-scratch.org")
>> (if contents (insert contents))))
>
> Thanks for sharing this... Always interesting to see what others do, what does
> help them in their workflows...
>
> Best regards,
> Seb
- Re: [Orgmode] Re: [Babel] Need for an extra literal block construct, (continued)
- Re: [Orgmode] Re: [Babel] Need for an extra literal block construct, Eric Schulte, 2010/11/19
- [Orgmode] Re: [Babel] Need for an extra literal block construct, Sébastien Vauban, 2010/11/20
- [Orgmode] Re: [Babel] Need for an extra literal block construct, Sébastien Vauban, 2010/11/22
- Re: [Orgmode] Re: [Babel] Need for an extra literal block construct, Eric Schulte, 2010/11/22
- [Orgmode] Re: [Babel] Need for an extra literal block construct, Sébastien Vauban, 2010/11/23
- [Orgmode] Re: [Babel] Need for an extra literal block construct, Sébastien Vauban, 2010/11/19
- Re: [Orgmode] Re: [Babel] Need for an extra literal block construct, Christian Moe, 2010/11/19
- [Orgmode] Re: [Babel] Need for an extra literal block construct, Sébastien Vauban, 2010/11/19
- [Orgmode] Re: [Babel] Need for an extra literal block construct, Dan Davison, 2010/11/20
- [Orgmode] Re: [Babel] Need for an extra literal block construct, Sébastien Vauban, 2010/11/20
- [Orgmode] Re: [Babel] Need for an extra literal block construct,
Dan Davison <=
- [Orgmode] Re: [Babel] Need for an extra literal block construct, Sébastien Vauban, 2010/11/22
- Re: [Orgmode] Re: [Babel] Need for an extra literal block construct, Nicolas Goaziou, 2010/11/21
- [Orgmode] Re: [Babel] Need for an extra literal block construct, Sébastien Vauban, 2010/11/22
- Re: [Orgmode] Re: [Babel] Need for an extra literal block construct, Nicolas Goaziou, 2010/11/23
- [Orgmode] Re: [Babel] Need for an extra literal block construct, Sébastien Vauban, 2010/11/23
- Re: [Orgmode] Re: [Babel] Need for an extra literal block construct, Nicolas Goaziou, 2010/11/24