[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Orgmode] should the mail list be splitted resp. sub-tagged ?
From: |
Samuel Wales |
Subject: |
Re: [Orgmode] should the mail list be splitted resp. sub-tagged ? |
Date: |
Fri, 17 Dec 2010 10:28:48 -0700 |
I have to use very large fonts, and tags present a huge problem for
that. I do, however, agree with the concept.
I would just like to propose that the tags be kept to just a few
letters. This allows reading more of the subject line.
Another point is that if important words are in the /beginning/ of the
subject line, that increases the chance that I and others who do not
have access to the entire subject line will read your message.
Also, while this might not work for everybody's client, I do know that
in gmail, it is very easy to /add/ a tag to a list according to a
pattern. Thus, [Orgmode] is not necessary in gmail; you just filter
on the headers and add a label "O".K (like "O"). And O is much easier
to deal with because it leaves more space for the rest of the subject.
[Orgmode] [babel] makes the subject line impossible to read in most
cases with large fonts.
Hope it helps.
S
- [Orgmode] should the mail list be splitted resp. sub-tagged ?, Torsten Wagner, 2010/12/17
- Re: [Orgmode] should the mail list be splitted resp. sub-tagged ?, Andrew J. Korty, 2010/12/17
- Re: [Orgmode] should the mail list be splitted resp. sub-tagged ?, Nick Dokos, 2010/12/17
- [Orgmode] Re: should the mail list be splitted resp. sub-tagged ?, William Gardella, 2010/12/17
- [Orgmode] Re: should the mail list be splitted resp. sub-tagged ?, William Gardella, 2010/12/17
- Re: [Orgmode] should the mail list be splitted resp. sub-tagged ?, Torsten Wagner, 2010/12/18