emacs-orgmode
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [O] [babel][bug] Export latex table using noweb suddenly broken?


From: Eric Schulte
Subject: Re: [O] [babel][bug] Export latex table using noweb suddenly broken?
Date: Wed, 02 Mar 2011 11:41:49 -0700
User-agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux)

It looks like the noweb option is working, but the results are being
inserted into the org-mode buffer verbatim, rather than in a latex
block.  Maybe we have different default header arguments.

If you add ":results latex" to the code block does that fix the problem?
Similarly if you evaluate the code block interactively in the org-mode
buffer, are the results inserted in a latex block or in an example
block?

Best -- Eric

Jeff Horn <address@hidden> writes:

> That's weird. This is what I get. Sorry I forgot to post it with the message:
>
> ----- begin tex source ------
> \section{Endogenizing Policy}
> \label{sec-1}
>
> TEst table export.
>
> \begin{verbatim}
> \begin{table}[htb!]
> \centering
>
> \begin{tabular}{llll}
> \toprule
> Expectation & Pre-policy & Post-policy & Cycle Summary \\
> \midrule
> Larger gov't sector & $\downarrow C$, $\downarrow U$, $\uparrow K$,
> $\uparrow Y$ & $\downarrow C$, $\downarrow U$, $\downarrow K$,
> $\downarrow Y$ & SR $\uparrow Y$, LR $\downarrow Y$ \\
> Smaller gov't sector & $\uparrow C$, $\uparrow U$,  $\downarrow K$,
> $\downarrow Y$ & $\uparrow C$, $\uparrow U$, $\uparrow K$, $\uparrow
> Y$ & SR $\downarrow Y$, LR $\uparrow Y$ \\
> \bottomrule
> \end{tabular}
>
> \end{table}
> \end{verbatim}
> ----- end tex source ------
>
> On Wed, Mar 2, 2011 at 9:38 AM, Eric Schulte <address@hidden> wrote:
>> Hi Jeff,
>>
>> When I export your org-mode file below (or when I simply evaluate the
>> code block with C-c C-c) it results in the following content under
>> "Endogenizing Policy" header, which appears correct to me.
>>
>> --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
>> \section{Endogenizing Policy}
>> \label{sec-1}
>>
>> Test table export.
>>
>> \begin{table}[htb!]
>> \centering
>>
>> \begin{tabular}{llll}
>> \toprule
>> Expectation & Pre-policy & Post-policy & Cycle Summary \\
>> \midrule
>> Larger gov't sector & $\downarrow C$, $\downarrow U$, $\uparrow K$,
>> $\uparrow Y$ & $\downarrow C$, $\downarrow U$, $\downarrow K$,
>> $\downarrow Y$ & SR $\uparrow Y$, LR $\downarrow Y$ \\
>> Smaller gov't sector & $\uparrow C$, $\uparrow U$,  $\downarrow K$,
>> $\downarrow Y$ & $\uparrow C$, $\uparrow U$, $\uparrow K$, $\uparrow
>> Y$ & SR $\downarrow Y$, LR $\uparrow Y$ \\
>> \bottomrule
>> \end{tabular}
>>
>> \end{table}
>> --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
>>
>> Best -- Eric
>>
>> Jeff Horn <address@hidden> writes:
>>
>>> Hey orgsters,
>>>
>>> A sample document like the one below was compiling fine on an older
>>> git commit, say about 10 days ago. Now, the tabular environment is
>>> wrapped in latex verbatim. It's as if it is no longer respecting the
>>> :noweb header.
>>>
>>> ----- begin org doc ------
>>> #+TITLE:     Table Export Test
>>>
>>> * Endogenizing Policy
>>> Test table export.
>>> #+source: tab-export
>>> #+begin_src latex :exports results :results latex :noweb yes
>>>   \begin{table}[htb!]
>>>   \centering
>>>   <<booktabs(table=tab-test,align="llll",env="tabular")>>
>>>   \end{table}
>>>  #+end_src
>>> ** Tables                                                         :noexport:
>>> #+tblname: tab-test
>>> | Expectation          | Pre-policy
>>>               | Post-policy
>>>         | Cycle Summary                      |
>>> |----------------------+-------------------------------------------------------------+----------------------------------------------------------------+------------------------------------|
>>> | Larger gov't sector  | $\downarrow C$, $\downarrow U$, $\uparrow K$,
>>> $\uparrow Y$  | $\downarrow C$, $\downarrow U$, $\downarrow K$,
>>> $\downarrow Y$ | SR $\uparrow Y$, LR $\downarrow Y$ |
>>> | Smaller gov't sector | $\uparrow C$, $\uparrow U$,  $\downarrow K$,
>>> $\downarrow Y$ | $\uparrow C$, $\uparrow U$, $\uparrow K$, $\uparrow
>>> Y$         | SR $\downarrow Y$, LR $\uparrow Y$ |
>>> ------ end org doc ------
>>>
>>> Can anyone else confirm?
>>



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]