[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [O] Re: [Orgmode] Grouping clock report by tag?
From: |
Giovanni Ridolfi |
Subject: |
Re: [O] Re: [Orgmode] Grouping clock report by tag? |
Date: |
Mon, 07 Mar 2011 11:11:04 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2 (windows-nt) |
John Hendy <address@hidden> writes:
> Sorry -- forgot the list...
>
> On Sun, Mar 6, 2011 at 12:06 PM, John Hendy <address@hidden> wrote:
>
>> On Sun, Mar 6, 2011 at 11:42 AM, Bastien <address@hidden> wrote:
>>
>>> John Hendy <address@hidden> writes:
>>>
>>> > How about a clock table with a :tag: column and an option to sort by
>>> > common tag?
The idea has been already suggested, with patches, but I think the patches
got lost during the FSF copyright assignment
1. by Adam Elliott, see:
On Feb 23, 2010, at 8:13 AM, Adam Elliott wrote:
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.orgmode/22526
2. And also by B Grobauer, with a huge patch
Sun, 20 Jun 2010 12:24:44 +0200
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode/2010-06/msg00536.html
If Bastien is going to implement this feature, I ask again[1]:
-----------------------------------------------------
Is it possible to check also for properies
and not only for tag?
we can add a special PROPERTY: CLOCKTAG
Rationale:
In my setup I have a remember template where I write the task I'm doing.
with some information e.g.:
** reading bibliography
CLOCK: [2010-06-21 lun 09:24]
:PROPERTIES:
:ID: lab
:Type:expected
:People: Giovanni
:Location: computer
:Connection: nil
:CLOCKTAG:PV Project
:Comment:
:END:
If the function checks also the :PROPERTIES: drawer and the existence of
the special PROPERTY: CLOCKTAG I can keep my setup and exploit this
marvellous new feature.
[1] http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode/2010-06/msg00554.html
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Another method could be to use the clock report from agenda R
Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2010 12:29:25 -0400
(Sebastien Vauban)
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode/2010-10/msg01494.html
cheers,
Giovanni