[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [O] Re: [Orgmode] Re: Automatic noexport tag based on rules?
From: |
Carsten Dominik |
Subject: |
Re: [O] Re: [Orgmode] Re: Automatic noexport tag based on rules? |
Date: |
Tue, 29 Mar 2011 23:05:54 +0200 |
On 29.3.2011, at 20:40, Matt Lundin wrote:
> John Hendy <address@hidden> writes:
>
>> On Sun, Mar 27, 2011 at 2:37 PM, Samuel Wales <address@hidden> wrote:
>>> That is indeed an excellent solution if you want to add a tag for a
>>> todo kw. However, I wonder if there is a direct approach, where the
>>> exporter simply does not export if it is a certain todo kw. Is the
>>> solution to have the exporter delete anything with that todo kw? Or
>>> is there a way to have it skip?
>>
>> I think that was Carsten's suggestion a bit back, but I'm not sure. I
>> think I asked if it was just deleting as it channeled through the
>> export function but didn't get a response. Looking back, though, I'm
>> sure that's what it was and my question was probably a bit silly :)
>
> You are correct. The export hook that Carsten provided deletes items in
> a temporary buffer, not in your org files. In fact, you can use the
> export hooks to do almost anything to this temporary buffers before they
> are exported; your original org files will not be touched.
>
>> And yes, I have turned this off as I find adding :noexport: to ever
>> todo in addition to whatever tags I already use to ID the project/task
>> is annoying and ugly. I've toyed with simply having a * Tracking
>> headline at the beginning of each file where I dump todos via capture
>> and track time and then having that have a top level noexport tag to
>> take care of things. That's pretty much nice, but I still like todos
>> created during meeting minutes or in the context of some other project
>> notes to stay where they make sense rather than separating them from
>> their location and putting them elsewhere.
>>
>> So.... I've got some solutions but am not quite happy yet. I should
>> re-visit Carsten's solution to strip it on export. That would probably
>> be the ticket.
>
> Yes, that would be the easiest solution, requiring no additional
> markup.
I have a good patch for this lined up - will check it in tomorrow.
- Carsten
- [O] Re: [Orgmode] Re: Automatic noexport tag based on rules?, Samuel Wales, 2011/03/27
- [O] Re: [Orgmode] Re: Automatic noexport tag based on rules?, John Hendy, 2011/03/27
- [O] Re: [Orgmode] Re: Automatic noexport tag based on rules?, Matt Lundin, 2011/03/29
- Re: [O] Re: [Orgmode] Re: Automatic noexport tag based on rules?,
Carsten Dominik <=
- Re: [O] Re: [Orgmode] Re: Automatic noexport tag based on rules?, Carsten Dominik, 2011/03/29
- Re: [O] Re: [Orgmode] Re: Automatic noexport tag based on rules?, John Hendy, 2011/03/29
- Re: [O] Re: [Orgmode] Re: Automatic noexport tag based on rules?, Carsten Dominik, 2011/03/29
- Re: [O] Re: [Orgmode] Re: Automatic noexport tag based on rules?, John Hendy, 2011/03/29
- Re: [O] Re: [Orgmode] Re: Automatic noexport tag based on rules?, Carsten Dominik, 2011/03/29