Re: [O] Continuation of main section text after subsections

[Colin Fraizer]

Was there ever a conclusion from this discussion?

I think I want something very similar to what Mr. van der Boom requested. I 
have outlines that contain varying amounts of text (paragraphs) and then, to 
avoid forgetting some task, I add a TODO item somewhere in the middle. That 
TODO item absorbs all the text following it until the next headline at the same 
or higher level.

For example, if I have an outline like

--------------
* Section 1
* Section 2
Paragraph 1
:
:
Paragraph 10
* Section 3
---------------

If I insert a TODO item after paragraph 3 and then collapse the outline, it 
hides paragraphs 4-10 as if they were part of that TODO item, even if they are 
unrelated.

I understand that this is not "proper" outline structure, but I was under the 
impression many people used org-mode for outlining /and/ for TODOs. ;-)

Syntax like "** END" to end the TODO (or other subtree) would, I think, do what 
I want. Based on my cursory look at it, I imagine one could simply change 
org-end-of-subtree to treat "^** END" specially (where the number of stars is 
the level). Normally, it would end with point at the beginning of the line "^** 
END" (treating as the next headline at the same or higher level) and return 
that as end of the tree.. However, I'd like for it to put point at the 
beginning of the line following that "fake" headline.

Then, you could suppress export of "^\\*+ END$".

I don't really see a reason not to do this, but perhaps I'm naively overlooking 
a big problem.

--Colin


-----Original Message-----
From: address@hidden [mailto:address@hidden On Behalf Of Sébastien Vauban
Sent: Monday, March 28, 2011 3:09 AM
To: address@hidden
Subject: [O] Re: Continuation of main section text after subsections

Hi,

Samuel Wales wrote:
> Perhaps we could have a tag like :noexport: except that it exports 
> body. It does not export the header. Optionally, it would be replaced 
> with a blank line.
>
> Then he can put headers anywhere he wants.
>
> Would this work for the OP's use case?

I really am not (yet?) convinced by the need -- as I don't really see how it 
fits in LaTeX/HTML.

However, just to answer one detail point, would such a new tag globally exist, 
it would have to be :ignoreheading: (it does already exist in Org-Beamer for 
"anonym" columns).

Best regards,
  Seb

--
Sébastien Vauban