emacs-orgmode
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [O] Bug: org-time-stamp loses repeater interval


From: Nick Dokos
Subject: Re: [O] Bug: org-time-stamp loses repeater interval
Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2011 19:10:52 -0400

Bastien <address@hidden> wrote:

> Hello Karl,
> 
> Karl Voit <address@hidden> writes:
> 
> > Sorry when I disagree for one case:
> >
> > When I change each entry in my test data using «C-c .» and clicking
> > on 1st of July ...
> >
> > ,----[ test data ]
> > | <2011-06-28 Tue>
> > | <2011-06-28 Tue +1w>
> > | <2011-06-28 Tue -1d>
> > | <2011-06-28 Tue +1w -1d>
> > `----
> >
> > ... I end up having this:
> >
> > ,----[ result ]
> > | <2011-07-01 Fri>
> > | <2011-07-01 Fri +1w>
> > | <2011-07-01 Fri -1d>
> > | <2011-07-01 Fri -1d>
> > `----
> >
> > In the last case, the repeater gets lost :-(
> 
> I cannot reproduce this.
> 

I can - but after earlier today, I'm not sure I trust my eyes: anybody else?

Org-mode version 7.5 (baseline.387.gf9cc.dirty)

(the dirty part is because of some Makefile experiments, nothing to do with 
timestamps).

> Note that if you use the warning _before_ the repeater,
> then it gets losts: 
> 
> <2011-06-28 Tue -1d +1w>

That's not the problem - check the "before" state of the third of Karl's
examples.

> 
> That because the warning should always be _after_ the repeater:
> 
> See section 8.3.2 "Repeated tasks" in the manual
> 
>   "the repeater should come first and the warning period last:
>   `DEADLINE: <2005-10-01 Sat +1m -3d>'."
> 

Nick




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]