[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [O] Suggestion: Stackoverflow for Orgmode
From: |
Rehan Iftikhar |
Subject: |
Re: [O] Suggestion: Stackoverflow for Orgmode |
Date: |
Wed, 20 Jul 2011 09:02:03 -0700 |
Personally I feel that the StackExchange interface is more accessible
to newcomers than mailing lists or Worg. Its a great way to ask a
questions and get an answer.
The mailing list is better at having conversations about a topic. Worg
is a great resource for hand-curated advice, which will always be
useful.
I would definitely use a StackExchange-like application for Org if it existed.
On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 6:45 AM, Memnon Anon
<address@hidden> wrote:
> Thomas Renkert <address@hidden> writes:
>
>> I noticed that - as more people with a diverse range of background knowledge
>> start to use orgmode - the mailing list is getting more and more difficult to
>> navigate:
>
> I do agree that the volume of mails did considerably increase.
>
>> a lot of threads are long and winding and many of the posts are basic
>> questions from beginners and questions about special use cases or scenarios
>> from
>> more experienced users.
>
> At this point, however, I have a different impression.
> Yes, there are some long threads, but those seem to be rarley those
> interesting for new users while setting up their orgworld.
> Those threads are *imho* usually about new features that need
> discussion, clarification etc.: a ping pong of ideas.
> When subareas emerge, tags like [BABEL] or now [CALFW] make it easy to
> parse them out if you are not interested.
>
> OTOH, I am used to dealing with mailing lists and I find them very
> convenient. Others may very well have a different impression.
> Is this worth a poll in a new thread?
>
>> An idea:
>> Many of you may be familiar with the Q&A-Sites www.stackoverflow.com or
>> www.superuser.com.
>
> There are already some questions about org on stackoverflow, if people
> are interested in this format, they can already go there. Setting this
> up seems overkill to me, especially, because we have Worg to collect
> the nuggets of all threads. If newcomers find the volume on this list
> overwhelming, I think splitting it into a -dev and a -user list would
> be the next logical step, first.
>
> However, I am not opposed to this idea when others agree it would be
> usefull. I can't really see myself using it so far, but that may very
> well change.
>
> Memnon
>
>
>
>
--
-Rehan
- [O] Suggestion: Stackoverflow for Orgmode, Thomas Renkert, 2011/07/20
- Re: [O] Suggestion: Stackoverflow for Orgmode, Memnon Anon, 2011/07/20
- Re: [O] Suggestion: Stackoverflow for Orgmode,
Rehan Iftikhar <=
- Re: [O] Suggestion: Stackoverflow for Orgmode, Bastien, 2011/07/21
- Re: [O] Suggestion: Stackoverflow for Orgmode, Jason Dunsmore, 2011/07/21
- Re: [O] Suggestion: Stackoverflow for Orgmode, suvayu ali, 2011/07/21
- Re: [O] Suggestion: Stackoverflow for Orgmode, John Hendy, 2011/07/21
- Re: [O] Suggestion: Stackoverflow for Orgmode, Bastien, 2011/07/22
- Re: [O] Suggestion: Stackoverflow for Orgmode, Bastien, 2011/07/22
- Re: [O] Suggestion: Stackoverflow for Orgmode, Rainer M Krug, 2011/07/22
- Re: [O] Suggestion: Stackoverflow for Orgmode, Bastien, 2011/07/22
Re: [O] Suggestion: Stackoverflow for Orgmode, Thomas Renkert, 2011/07/24