On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 9:55 AM, Dirk Scharff
<address@hidden> wrote:
Hi
Am 22.07.2011 um 09:34 schrieb Rainer M Krug:
For tangling: you could put from __future__ imports into the :shebang and use padline ":padline no", i.e.:
#+source: the_test
#+begin_src python :var x=3 :tangle test.py :results output :shebang from __future__ imports :padline no
print x
#+end_src
which results in
from __future__ imports
print x
Keep in mind, that I have NEVER used python (although I should…).
While I'd not call that a clean solution to the problem it will keep me going for now.
Agreed - but it works. Good.
Thank you very much for pointing that possibility out, I haven't thought about trying to move the import statement.
As for python: its a nice language worth trying in my opinion ;)
Sounds like it - I just need time.....
Cheers and good luck with your thesis,
Rainer
With this i could do the table calculation manually by inserting 100-1000 call statements (in the real use case I need for my masters-thesis) but it would be really nice if i could use a table cell as argument for code-blocks.
A second problem I have at the moment lies with the execution of source-blocks in tables. What I'd like to do:
| argument | result |
| 1 | #ERROR |
| | |
#+TBLFM: $2=call_the_test(x=$<)
I guess I'm just doing something wrong here. Executing the #+Tblfm results in the error: "reference $< not found in buffer". How do I do the reference correctly in this case?
You can test both cases in the attached org-file.
best regards,
Dirk