Re: [O] Schedule event

[Sebastien Vauban]

Hi Jason,

Jason Dunsmore wrote:
> "Sebastien Vauban" <address@hidden> writes:
>> suvayu ali wrote:
>>> Yes, this would be a nice addition. I always find it difficult to decide
>>> how to put regular timestamps too.
>>
>> By regular timestamps, you mean: inactive timestamps?
>
> I think he means active timestamps with no keyword. The Org FAQ and manual
> refer to active timestamps with no keyword as "plain timestamps".
>
>> Can you, maybe, comment on what makes the decision difficult?
>
> At least for me, in my early Org days, I wasn't sure of the best formatting
> convention for "plain timestamps". I settled on putting them on the line
> directly after the header with the proper indentation, since this is how
> SCHEDULED items were inserted.

OK. I thought the difficult decision was about the type of timestamps:
SCHEDULED, not SCHEDULED but active, or inactive.

Now, I understand he meant about the positioning of the timestamp itself.
Thanks for clarifying this.

Best regards,
  Seb

-- 
Sebastien Vauban