Re: [O] [PATCH] Fix renumbering for footnotes at BOL.

[Tassilo Horn]

Nicolas Goaziou <address@hidden> writes:

Hi!

>> I don't either, and that's a good thing.  I added that just as some
>> extra paranoia so that you get an error if a footnote gets broken.
>
> Well, provided the first part of the function doesn't modify the
> buffer, I still don't see how the assert could fail, even with a
> broken footnote.  Now, I may also be less paranoid than you are in
> that case.

You are right.  And the regex doesn't even match broken footnotes, that
is, footnotes with missing numbers.

> Do you still think that assert should be a stayer?

Nope, feel free to remove that line.

Bye,
Tassilo