Re: [O] [RFC] Standardized code block keywords

[Eric Schulte]

"Sebastien Vauban" <address@hidden> writes:

> Hi Daniel,
>
> Daniel Bausch wrote:
>>>          named code blocks [1] -- "source" "srcname" "function"
>>> calling external functions [2] -- "call" "lob"
>>>                 named data [3] -- "tblname" "resname" "results" "data"
>>
>> what about "#+name:" for [1] and [3], and "#+call:" for [2] ?
>>
>> That a table or list contains data is obvious.  The only thing, the 
>> additional 
>> line is for, is to "name" it.
>
> As Eric showed us, this is not always to name it... If the table is the
> results of an unamed block, you will have #+name: followed by no name!
>
> #+name:
> | line 1 | data1 |
> | line 2 | data2 |
>
> what I also find quite disturbing.
>

I also find this to be disconcerting. -- Eric

>
> Best regards,
>   Seb

-- 
Eric Schulte
http://cs.unm.edu/~eschulte/