Re: [O] [babel] lisp block evaluation vs. call

[Andreas Leha]

Andreas Leha <address@hidden> writes:

> Hi all,
>
> Say, I have a lisp function working on (and returning a) table:
>
> #+name: insert_hline
> #+header: :var fulltable=testtable :var after_row=1
> #+begin_src emacs-lisp
>   (let ((rrr (cons (quote hline) fulltable))
>         (bottomrows (nthcdr after_row fulltable))
>         (toprows (reverse (nthcdr (- (length fulltable) after_row) (reverse 
> fulltable)))))
>     (setcdr rrr bottomrows)
>     (setcdr (nthcdr (- after_row 1) fulltable) rrr)
>     fulltable)
>  #+end_src
>
> Now, I want to apply it on this testtable:
> #+name: testtable
> | parameter | value |
> | amount    |     1 |
> | margin    |    12 |
>
>
>
> When evaluated directly, this works fine and as expected:
>
> #+results: insert_hline
> | parameter | value |
> |-----------+-------|
> | amount    |     1 |
> | margin    |    12 |
>
>
> But when I call this code block, I miss the header, even though the
> manual states
> #+begin_quote
> For example Emacs Lisp code blocks ignore the :colnames header
> argument entirely given the ease with which tables with column names
> may be handled directly in Emacs Lisp.
> #+end_quote
> #+call: insert_hline(fulltable=testtable, after_row=1)
>
> #+results: insert_hline(fulltable=testtable, after_row=1)
> | amount |  1 |
> | margin | 12 |
>
>
> If I want to get the header back, I have to explicitly
> state ':colnames yes'
> #+call: insert_hline(fulltable=testtable,after_row=1) :colnames yes
>
> #+results: insert_hline(fulltable=testtable,after_row=1)
> | parameter | value |
> |-----------+-------|
> | amount    |     1 |
> | margin    |    12 |
>
>
> I guess, that inconsistency I will have to live with?
>
> Best regards,
> Andreas

Hi all,

I just remembered this has been answered:
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.orgmode/51695/focus=51701

So, this can be closed.  Sorry for the noise.

- Andreas