emacs-orgmode
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [O] [PATCH] link descriptions in :file results of src blocks


From: Andreas Leha
Subject: Re: [O] [PATCH] link descriptions in :file results of src blocks
Date: Sun, 01 Apr 2012 10:09:40 +0200
User-agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.94 (gnu/linux)

Eric Schulte <address@hidden> writes:

> [...]
>>> I would like to apply this patch, however I have some questions about
>>> the use of the :file argument and the result itself to fill in the
>>> description if the :filelinkdescr header argument is left blank.  Also,
>>> I would suggest that :file-desc is a better name for this header
>>> argument.
>>
>> Hi Eric,
>>
>> thanks for considering this patch.  Feel free to change the term to
>> anything more appropriate.
>>
>>>
>>> In my opinion using the :file argument as a description changes (or at
>>> least adds to) the meaning of the :file header argument.  Is there a
>>> significant benefit to this behavior?  If not I'd prefer that an empty
>>> :file-desc header argument have no effect.
>>
>> My original use case was indeed making a code block to
>> produce [[file.pdf][file.pdf]] instead of [[file.pdf]] (see
>> http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.orgmode/53941).  So, if you
>> remove the possibility to specify an empty :file-desc, for me that would
>> mean to give the file name twice, as in
>> : #+begin_src R :results graphics :file test2.png :file-desc test2.png
>> which would be avoidable with my proposed behaviour.
>>
>> I could live with that, though I'd still prefer not to have to type more
>> than necessary...
>>
>
> Makes sense, I've just pushed up a solution which builds on your initial
> patch by
>
> 1. changing :filelinkdescr to :file-desc
>
> 2. when an empty :file-desc header argument is specified it's value is
>    set to the value of the file path resulting in
>    [[file.pdf][file.pdf]]
>
> 3. adding documentation and a test case
>
> Please let me know if this misses any part of your intended use case.
>
> Thanks for the contribution!

Hi Eric,

I seem not to be able to see that push.  My git log contains only
,----
| 8d43aa2 test the new file-desc header argument
| 670c7f3 simplified implementation of :file-desc header argument
| 1193844 documentation for the new file-desc header argument
| 59800b2 change name of filelinkdescr to file-desc
| a58a4f0 new source block header argument :filelinkdescr
`----
and indeed, the functionality you describe in 2. seems not to be
available.  What did I miss?

Regards,
Andreas





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]