emacs-orgmode
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [O] [PATCH] link descriptions in :file results of src blocks


From: Eric Schulte
Subject: Re: [O] [PATCH] link descriptions in :file results of src blocks
Date: Sun, 01 Apr 2012 08:38:48 -0400
User-agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.94 (gnu/linux)

Andreas Leha <address@hidden> writes:

> Eric Schulte <address@hidden> writes:
>
>> [...]
>>>> I would like to apply this patch, however I have some questions about
>>>> the use of the :file argument and the result itself to fill in the
>>>> description if the :filelinkdescr header argument is left blank.  Also,
>>>> I would suggest that :file-desc is a better name for this header
>>>> argument.
>>>
>>> Hi Eric,
>>>
>>> thanks for considering this patch.  Feel free to change the term to
>>> anything more appropriate.
>>>
>>>>
>>>> In my opinion using the :file argument as a description changes (or at
>>>> least adds to) the meaning of the :file header argument.  Is there a
>>>> significant benefit to this behavior?  If not I'd prefer that an empty
>>>> :file-desc header argument have no effect.
>>>
>>> My original use case was indeed making a code block to
>>> produce [[file.pdf][file.pdf]] instead of [[file.pdf]] (see
>>> http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.orgmode/53941).  So, if you
>>> remove the possibility to specify an empty :file-desc, for me that would
>>> mean to give the file name twice, as in
>>> : #+begin_src R :results graphics :file test2.png :file-desc test2.png
>>> which would be avoidable with my proposed behaviour.
>>>
>>> I could live with that, though I'd still prefer not to have to type more
>>> than necessary...
>>>
>>
>> Makes sense, I've just pushed up a solution which builds on your initial
>> patch by
>>
>> 1. changing :filelinkdescr to :file-desc
>>
>> 2. when an empty :file-desc header argument is specified it's value is
>>    set to the value of the file path resulting in
>>    [[file.pdf][file.pdf]]
>>
>> 3. adding documentation and a test case
>>
>> Please let me know if this misses any part of your intended use case.
>>
>> Thanks for the contribution!
>
> Hi Eric,
>
> I seem not to be able to see that push.  My git log contains only
> ,----
> | 8d43aa2 test the new file-desc header argument
> | 670c7f3 simplified implementation of :file-desc header argument
> | 1193844 documentation for the new file-desc header argument
> | 59800b2 change name of filelinkdescr to file-desc
> | a58a4f0 new source block header argument :filelinkdescr
> `----
> and indeed, the functionality you describe in 2. seems not to be
> available.  What did I miss?
>

Hi Andreas,

The commit implementing the behavior described in (2) is 670c7f3.
Please take a look at the test-ob/file-desc-header-argument test case.
If it is passing on your system (as it is on mine) then the behavior
described in (2) is in fact implemented.

Best,

>
> Regards,
> Andreas
>
>
>

-- 
Eric Schulte
http://cs.unm.edu/~eschulte/



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]