[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [O] Problems with (defvar foo) and Emacs 23
From: |
Bastien |
Subject: |
Re: [O] Problems with (defvar foo) and Emacs 23 |
Date: |
Mon, 02 Apr 2012 10:21:54 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.94 (gnu/linux) |
Hi Nick,
Nick Dokos <address@hidden> writes:
> Agreed, but the point is that each and every variable renaming will need
> to be checked in the light of these criteria. Bugs like this have the
> potential of creating havoc for a long time to come.
>
> It may be easier to start from a working state than to try to fix the
> current broken state piecemeal.
The thing is... Org is working fine here. Of course, I'm not a
"thousand eyes" by myself and some features might be broken in the
current state, I will continue trying to catch them.
> Besides, I'd rather have a single commit
> in the history that does the right thing: having one commit that creates
> the initial buggy state and then N commits at various times to fix the
> brokenness might create all sorts of problems (breaking bisectability
> e.g.)
Theoretically agreed. But again: if you look at the diffs from the
list of commits you sent, most of them are okay. Let's try to fix the
ones that are *not* okay instead of going backward? I will revert the
commits if things are really broken.
Best,
--
Bastien
- [O] Problems with (defvar foo) and Emacs 23, Bernt Hansen, 2012/04/01
- Re: [O] Problems with (defvar foo) and Emacs 23, Bastien, 2012/04/02
- Re: [O] Problems with (defvar foo) and Emacs 23, Achim Gratz, 2012/04/02
- Re: [O] Problems with (defvar foo) and Emacs 23, Bastien, 2012/04/03
- Re: [O] Problems with (defvar foo) and Emacs 23, Achim Gratz, 2012/04/03
- Re: [O] Problems with (defvar foo) and Emacs 23, Bastien, 2012/04/04
Re: [O] Problems with (defvar foo) and Emacs 23, Bastien, 2012/04/02
Re: [O] Problems with (defvar foo) and Emacs 23, Nick Dokos, 2012/04/01