Re: [O] Yearly repeats on the agenda

[Nick Dokos]

Bastien <address@hidden> wrote:

> Hi Nick,
> 
> Nick Dokos <address@hidden> writes:
> 
> > so it becomes "<2012-04-17.*?>". Hence it removes the date in the third
> > example above, but not in the other two.
> >
> > The question is whether this is intended or not
> 
> I think this is intended.  If timestamps were not removed from today's
> date, agenda listing items scheduled/timestamped for today would be less
> readable.  
> 

Oh, I agree - the removal is certainly desirable. I meant whether the
non-removal of not-today's date is intentional :-)

Nick