[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [O] "# <<tag>>" should stick to the following text
From: |
Nick Dokos |
Subject: |
Re: [O] "# <<tag>>" should stick to the following text |
Date: |
Sun, 06 May 2012 21:08:14 -0400 |
Nicolas Goaziou <address@hidden> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> François Pinard <address@hidden> writes:
>
> > I'm not sure I'm using "# <<tag>>" correctly, but my feeling is that it
> > should stick to the following text in various Org operations. Let's say
> > I have something like (as I think it):
>
> "# <<tag>>" is a deprecated construct. I suggest to avoid bothering with
> it.
>
>
With all due respect, that is not a satisfactory answer. I, for one (or
for two: François would surely appreciate it too), would appreciate a
pointer to the deprecation notice (I don't remember seeing one but that
doesn't mean much), and a pointer (if different) to whatever construct
is supposed to replace it.
Thanks,
Nick
- [O] "# <<tag>>" should stick to the following text, François Pinard, 2012/05/06
- Re: [O] "# <<tag>>" should stick to the following text, Nicolas Goaziou, 2012/05/06
- Re: [O] "# <<tag>>" should stick to the following text, François Pinard, 2012/05/06
- Re: [O] "# <<tag>>" should stick to the following text, François Pinard, 2012/05/06
- Re: [O] "# <<tag>>" should stick to the following text, Nicolas Goaziou, 2012/05/07
- Re: [O] "# <<tag>>" should stick to the following text, Eric S Fraga, 2012/05/07
- Re: [O] "# <<tag>>" should stick to the following text, François Pinard, 2012/05/07
- Re: [O] "# <<tag>>" should stick to the following text, Nick Dokos, 2012/05/08
- Re: [O] "# <<tag>>" should stick to the following text,
Nick Dokos <=
- Re: [O] "# <<tag>>" should stick to the following text, Christian Moe, 2012/05/07