Re: [O] More flyspell-overlays removed

[Jeffrey Spencer]

I was also thinking about this recently but hadn't gotten as far as writing a patch.

I was thinking some tags you know you want to remove the fly-spell overlays but for example caption you might or might not want the flyspell overlays removed. If there was a variable that could be set to choose some that might or might not want the overlays to remove. Not sure if this is possible but what I was originally looking at doing but hadn't gotten time.

Cheers,

Jeff 

On Sun, Jul 29, 2012 at 8:38 AM, Bjarte Johansen <address@hidden> wrote:

On 28 Jul, 2012, at 11:27 , Bastien <address@hidden> wrote:

I cannot apply it because it adds keywords at the wrong place.  
For example you cannot add "startup:" in the first (cond ((...)))
because "startup:" is not a "backend specific content."  And some
other discrepencies.

OK, I understand. I should have spent some more time trying to 
understand the code. 

I'd welcome a patch for removing more flyspell overlays, but it
has to be rewritten.  I'm not using flyspell so someone else will
have to do roll his sleeves.

I'd be willing to put in the effort to make a proper patch, but I need some 
help to understand what is going on in this function. It is not obvious to 
me.

The places flyspell-overlays needs to be removed are in the startup, 
options, latex_header.  Some of structures that might be used in latex like 
lstlisting and verbatim where the text also should not have flyspell-overlays.

There are also some other places like label, caption and attr.