[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [O] are super-hidden technical blocks required?
|
From: |
Russell Adams |
|
Subject: |
Re: [O] are super-hidden technical blocks required? |
|
Date: |
Mon, 30 Jul 2012 09:27:49 -0500 |
|
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) |
On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 11:27:28AM +0100, Rasmus wrote:
> Bastien <address@hidden> writes:
>
> > I don't think this is about plain text vs ?? la XML (because XML and
> > friends are plain text too) but about whether we should allow a new
> > type of block to keep non-human-readable stuff out of the way.
>
> How about just allowing for a list of properties being hidden. For
> instance all uuid properties could be hidden.
Aren't property drawers already hidden by default?
------------------------------------------------------------------
Russell Adams address@hidden
PGP Key ID: 0x1160DCB3 http://www.adamsinfoserv.com/
Fingerprint: 1723 D8CA 4280 1EC9 557F 66E8 1154 E018 1160 DCB3