[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [O] From latest maint/master, no need to (require 'org-install)
From: |
Nick Dokos |
Subject: |
Re: [O] From latest maint/master, no need to (require 'org-install) |
Date: |
Sun, 07 Oct 2012 00:48:30 -0400 |
Eric Fraga <address@hidden> wrote:
> Sebastien Vauban <address@hidden> writes:
>
> > Hi Eric,
> >
> > Eric Fraga wrote:
> >> (add-to-list 'load-path "~/git/org-mode")
> >
> > Why that one?
>
> Ahh, that's a bit of historical garbage. There was a point a while back
> where org-install seemed to have lisp/org-xxx paths and the easiest fix
> was to add the root to the list of paths. The problem was fixed fairly
> quickly but I forgot to remove my temporary fix.
>
> >> What should I or could I remove from this?
> >
> > What I do is:
> >
> > #+begin_src emacs-lisp
> > (when (locate-library "org-install")
> > (require 'org-install))
> > #+end_src
>
> Actually, I now have
>
> #+begin_src emacs-lisp
> (add-to-list 'load-path "~/git/org-mode/lisp")
> (add-to-list 'load-path "~/git/org-mode/contrib/lisp/")
> (require 'org)
> #+end_src
>
> with a number of other =require= calls for specific ob- and org-e-
> packages. This seems to work just fine.
>
Note however that this way, the contrib directory will be found before
the main lisp directory and that may cause occasional problems. This was
recently discussed in this thread:
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.orgmode/60929/focus=61131
Nick
> My question now is whether I should replace the =(require 'org)= by
> =(require 'org-loaddefs)= which seems to be the way that Emacs is moving
> for packages?
>
> Thanks,
> eric
>
> --
> : Eric S Fraga, GnuPG: 0xC89193D8FFFCF67D
> : in Emacs 24.2.50.1 and Org release_7.9.2-406-g2c78ca
>
>
- Re: [O] From latest maint/master, no need to (require 'org-install): Lisp error, (continued)
- Re: [O] From latest maint/master, no need to (require 'org-install), Bastien, 2012/10/03
- Re: [O] From latest maint/master, no need to (require 'org-install), Eric Fraga, 2012/10/03
- Re: [O] From latest maint/master, no need to (require 'org-install), Thomas S. Dye, 2012/10/05
- Re: [O] From latest maint/master, no need to (require 'org-install), Sebastien Vauban, 2012/10/05
- Re: [O] From latest maint/master, no need to (require 'org-install), Eric Fraga, 2012/10/06
- Re: [O] From latest maint/master, no need to (require 'org-install),
Nick Dokos <=
- Re: [O] From latest maint/master, no need to (require 'org-install), Achim Gratz, 2012/10/07
- Re: [O] From latest maint/master, no need to (require 'org-install), Eric S Fraga, 2012/10/07
- Re: [O] From latest maint/master, no need to (require 'org-install), Sebastien Vauban, 2012/10/09
- Re: [O] From latest maint/master, no need to (require 'org-install), Sebastien Vauban, 2012/10/09
- Re: [O] From latest maint/master, no need to (require 'org-install), Achim Gratz, 2012/10/09
- Re: [O] From latest maint/master, no need to (require 'org-install), Michael Brand, 2012/10/09
- Re: [O] From latest maint/master, no need to (require 'org-install), Bastien, 2012/10/27
- Re: [O] From latest maint/master, no need to (require 'org-install), Sebastien Vauban, 2012/10/09
- Re: [O] From latest maint/master, no need to (require 'org-install), Bastien, 2012/10/27
Re: [O] From latest maint/master, no need to (require 'org-install), Rainer M Krug, 2012/10/05