Re: [O] Bug: New Exporter macro expansion

[Nicolas Goaziou]

Hello,

"Sebastien Vauban"
<address@hidden> writes:

> Shouldn't macros be included via SETUPFILE?  I've always considered that
> INCLUDE was for the (sort of) text part, while SETUPFILE for the keywords
> part.
>
> Are there constraints on what we can include via which mechanism?

You include anything with #+INCLUDE:. You are limited to some keywords
with #+SETUPFILE.

For now, #+SETUP_FILE doesn't handle macros in the new exporter. It
should, but I want to remove the keyword in favor of #+INCLUDE anyway.
See the other thread about it.


Regards,

-- 
Nicolas Goaziou