Re: [O] Sexp aganda entries broken?

[Nicolas Goaziou]

Simon Thum <address@hidden> writes:

> I see, it just seemed to me that org-contacts uses it for (seemingly)
> good reasons and there is no replacement or deprecation. Is there
> missing consensus on this syntax?

I don't think so. AFAIU this syntax was created to include diary entries
without the overhead of generating the diary first. There are not meant
to be used as a replacement for timestamps.


Regards,

-- 
Nicolas Goaziou