Re: [O] Bug: with option hidestars to be hidden stars are on white backround on block terminal [7.9.2 (release_7.9.2-882-gf47a71 @ /home/grfz/src/org-mode/lisp/)]

[Gregor Zattler]

Hi Achim, Bastien, org-developers,
* Achim Gratz <address@hidden> [28. Dec. 2012]:
> Am 28.12.2012 14:36, schrieb Gregor Zattler:
>>I use option `hidestars' and Emacs/org-mode on a terminal with
>>black background.  Since a few days the superflous stars are not
>>hidden any more but shown on a white background.  This makes them
>>stand out very much.
> 
> I don't see how this change is related since it changes the
> foreground, not the background.  What do the following things return
> if you eval them in the org buffer (with M-: since they are not
> interactive):

I don't know if it's essential to this tests if the commit in
question is applied or not so I do this two times: 

first line is for 
Org-mode version 7.9.2 (release_7.9.2-890-g9cf680 @ 
/home/grfz/src/org-mode/lisp/)
(--> patch reverted; stars are hidden)
second line is for
Org-mode version 7.9.2 (release_7.9.2-877-ge6d8ed @ 
/home/grfz/src/org-mode/lisp/)
(--> with Bastiens patch, stars with white background)
> (face-background 'default nil 'default)
"unspecified-bg"
"unspecified-bg"
> (face-foreground 'default nil 'default)
"unspecified-fg"
"unspecified-fg"
> (face-background 'org-hide nil 'default)
"unspecified-bg"
"unspecified-bg"
> (face-foreground 'org-hide nil 'default)
"black"
"unspecified-bg" (yes: "-bg")

This is on a customised rxvt-unicode with (among others) the
following command line options:  
-tn rxvt-unicode-256color -fg white -bg black
It's the same on uncustomised xterm.

Ciao, Gregor
-- 
 -... --- .-. . -.. ..--.. ...-.-