Re: [O] [new exporter] adhere org-export-date-timestamp-format?

[Nicolas Goaziou]

Bastien <address@hidden> writes:

> I agree they are general and should be move out of org-export.el.
>
> Note that one of my plan for 8.[01] is to put org.el on diet so that
> it loads more quickly and for more basic stuff.  So maybe there will
> be org-plan.el at some point for org-schedule, org-deadline and 
> anything related to planning.  Ideally, Org would *just* be outline
> reloaded (with orgtble and all editing facilities), while other
> features would have their own library.  So maybe those functions
> will end up outside of org.el one day... but I'd say it's okay
> to have them in org.el for now.

The attached patch moves them into org.el, with an org-timestamp-
prefix.

Though, I think I have to withdraw my proposal about using #+DATE: value
as a time format string. Indeed, date value, along with any document
property, is parsed, which defeats the purpose of using it as a format
string.

We can still implement a convenient macro to handle timestamps in date
keyword.

What do you think?


Regards,

-- 
Nicolas Goaziou

0001-Move-functions-operating-on-timestamp-objects-into-o.patch
Description: Text Data