[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [O] Still Wishing for Snooze
From: |
Michael Brand |
Subject: |
Re: [O] Still Wishing for Snooze |
Date: |
Thu, 7 Feb 2013 16:25:43 +0100 |
Hi Bastien
On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 10:44 AM, Bastien <address@hidden> wrote:
> You can now use a "delay cookie" like this:
>
> SCHEDULED: <2013-02-07 jeu. -2d>
>
> The item will not be shown today, but in three days.
For this case I would use:
SCHEDULED: <2013-02-09 Sat>
It seems I don’t get the point because when a TODO with repeater
SCHEDULED: <2013-02-01 Fri +1w -3d>
is set to DONE the delay remains and this way also here I would not
use a delay but:
SCHEDULED: <2013-02-04 Mon +1w>
The usefulness of a SCHEDULED delay I see together with a TODO and
repeater to implement an _exception_ (to simplify: exception just for
the first date, before the repetitions). For example
SCHEDULED: <2013-02-01 Fri +1w -3d>
would mean: Usually start working on the entry earliest on the first
day of the month except [2013-02-01 Fri] when work can not start
before [2013-02-04 Mon]. It would start to show in the agenda on
[2013-02-04 Mon], [2013-03-01 Fri], [2013-04-01 Mon], [2013-05-01
Wed], [2013-06-01 Sat] etc. On let’s say [2013-02-05 Tue] it would be
set to DONE and would change to:
SCHEDULED: <2013-03-01 Fri +1w>
Note the automatically removed delay.
Am I missing something?
Michael
- Re: [O] Still Wishing for Snooze, Bastien, 2013/02/07
- Re: [O] Still Wishing for Snooze,
Michael Brand <=
- Re: [O] Still Wishing for Snooze, Samuel Loury, 2013/02/09
- Re: [O] Still Wishing for Snooze, Bastien, 2013/02/12
- Re: [O] Still Wishing for Snooze, Michael Brand, 2013/02/12
- Re: [O] Still Wishing for Snooze, Michael Brand, 2013/02/12
- Re: [O] Still Wishing for Snooze, Bastien, 2013/02/12
- Re: [O] Still Wishing for Snooze, Bastien, 2013/02/12
- Re: [O] Still Wishing for Snooze, Michael Brand, 2013/02/12
- Re: [O] Still Wishing for Snooze, Samuel Loury, 2013/02/13
- Re: [O] Still Wishing for Snooze, Bastien, 2013/02/13