[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [O] [patch] ox-koma-letter
From: |
Alan Schmitt |
Subject: |
Re: [O] [patch] ox-koma-letter |
Date: |
Sat, 02 Mar 2013 20:21:25 +0100 |
User-agent: |
mu4e 0.9.9.5-dev6; emacs 24.2.1 |
Rasmus writes:
> Alan Schmitt <address@hidden> writes:
>
> > As the order matters, as said in some replies, I prefer the
> > AFTER_CLOSING approach.
>
> How can one use the a `:' in a AFTER_CLOSEing?
Sorry, I don't know. I thought it was the approach you were suggesting.
> > I rely on an lco for that. To give you an idea of my setup, here it is.
> > I found that with this setup I can quickly write a letter. If someday
> > I need letters with a different setup, I just need to change the lco.
>
> But it lacks generality and it relies heavily on a LCO file, which I
> am not sure it entirely desirable.
Yes, it lacks generality. But I find it works great for me. Writing
letters in latex before was a pain, so I was doing it in Pages. I
consider this is an improvement ;-)
Alan
- Re: [O] [patch] ox-koma-letter, Alan Schmitt, 2013/03/01
- Re: [O] [patch] ox-koma-letter, Bastien, 2013/03/02
- Re: [O] [patch] ox-koma-letter, Rasmus, 2013/03/02
- Re: [O] [patch] ox-koma-letter, Rasmus, 2013/03/02
- Re: [O] [patch] ox-koma-letter,
Alan Schmitt <=
- Re: [O] [patch] ox-koma-letter, Rasmus, 2013/03/02
- Re: [O] [patch] ox-koma-letter, Alan Schmitt, 2013/03/03
- Re: [O] [patch] ox-koma-letter, Nicolas Goaziou, 2013/03/03
- Re: [O] [patch] ox-koma-letter, Alan Schmitt, 2013/03/04
- Re: [O] [patch] ox-koma-letter, Nicolas Goaziou, 2013/03/04
- Re: [O] [patch] ox-koma-letter, Alan Schmitt, 2013/03/04
- Re: [O] [patch] ox-koma-letter, Rasmus, 2013/03/04
- Re: [O] [patch] ox-koma-letter, Nicolas Goaziou, 2013/03/04
- Re: [O] [patch] ox-koma-letter, Alan Schmitt, 2013/03/05
- Re: [O] [patch] ox-koma-letter, Nicolas Goaziou, 2013/03/05