Re: [O] latex listings number-lines problems with new exporter

[Thomas Alexander Gerds]

thanks for the fast fix. now, I agree that there is no great need to put
a link into the doc-string of org-latex-listings-options.

Nicolas Goaziou <address@hidden> writes:

> Hello,
>
> Thomas Alexander Gerds <address@hidden> writes:
>
>> using org-mode "7.9.3f" and the new exporter I was desperately
>> trying to get line numbers back for exported R code blocks using the
>> latex listing package. first I tried
>> (setq org-latex-listings-options '(("basicstyle" "\\small")
>> ("numbers" "left")))
>> which gives
>> ,----
>> | \lstset{basicstyle=\small,numbers=left,language=R,numbers=none}
>> `----
>> that this is possible seems sub-optimal :)
>
> Thanks. This should be fixed in master. If user provides "numbers"
> option, "+n" and "-n" switches will be ignored from src-block.
>
>> some debugging led me via org-latex-src-block to
>> org-element-src-block-parser which indicated adding a switch "-n"
>> behind to the scr-block:
>> ,----
>> | #+BEGIN_SRC R -n :results output raw :exports both :session *R*
>> | :cache yes
>>
>> this works and has a new feature (switch +n) which allows numbering
>> to be continued in subsequent blocks.
>> Now, I would like to set numbers on globally or buffer-local for all
>> blocks. But is it possible to set a switch globally?  I think
>> parameters can still be set with an appropriate #+PROPERTY:
>> statement!?
>
> This isn't possible. But, as noted previously, you can activate
> numbering globally by adding ("numbers" "left") association to
> org-latex-listings-options'.
>
>> whatever the answer, it would be nice if this feature was mentioned
>> in the help string of org-latex-listing-options.
>
> I don't seed the need for that. "+n" and "-n" switches are already
> documented in the manual, and are not "listings" specific. They are
> not even LaTeX specific.
>
> Anyway, if you think it's still important, I will accept a patch for
> it (along with one modifying `org-latex-minted-options' accordingly).
>
> Regards,