[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [O] [Out-of-Thread] Re: [RFC] Org syntax (draft)
From: |
Carsten Dominik |
Subject: |
Re: [O] [Out-of-Thread] Re: [RFC] Org syntax (draft) |
Date: |
Mon, 18 Mar 2013 07:08:39 +0100 |
Hi Z,
can you show an example on how you use it? Maybe we can find a better way.
Nicolas is right that portability is compromised by customizable emphasis.
- Carsten
On 18.3.2013, at 00:02, zeltak <address@hidden> wrote:
> Hi all
>
> i just finished a great conversation on #org-mode with some great people.
> they told me about this thread and the planned changes that may or may not
> occur to the syntax and id like to just raise the newbee perspective.
>
> I find the ability to add custom emphasise with custom faces invaluable. i
> find it very easy to add and very useful for me since i use ALOT of color
> highlights in my academic work.
>
> i really hope that there is some way to leave the current mphasise with
> custom faces options as is
>
>
> thx alot guys
>
> Z
- Re: [O] [Out-of-Thread] Re: [RFC] Org syntax (draft), zeltak, 2013/03/17
- Re: [O] [Out-of-Thread] Re: [RFC] Org syntax (draft),
Carsten Dominik <=
- Re: [O] [Out-of-Thread] Re: [RFC] Org syntax (draft), Thorsten Jolitz, 2013/03/18
- Re: [O] [Out-of-Thread] Re: [RFC] Org syntax (draft), zeltak, 2013/03/18
- Re: [O] [Out-of-Thread] Re: [RFC] Org syntax (draft), W. Greenhouse, 2013/03/18
- Re: [O] [Out-of-Thread] Re: [RFC] Org syntax (draft), Marcin Borkowski, 2013/03/18
- Re: [O] [Out-of-Thread] Re: [RFC] Org syntax (draft), Carsten Dominik, 2013/03/18
- Re: [O] [Out-of-Thread] Re: [RFC] Org syntax (draft), Rasmus, 2013/03/18
- Re: [O] [Out-of-Thread] Re: [RFC] Org syntax (draft), Aaron Ecay, 2013/03/18
- Re: [O] [Out-of-Thread] Re: [RFC] Org syntax (draft), Nicolas Richard, 2013/03/19
- Re: [O] [Out-of-Thread] Re: [RFC] Org syntax (draft), Nicolas Goaziou, 2013/03/21
- Re: [O] [Out-of-Thread] Re: [RFC] Org syntax (draft), Samuel Wales, 2013/03/19