Re: [O] :EXPORT_FILE_NAME: in new exporter possible?

[Bastien]

Achim Gratz <address@hidden> writes:

> Am 25.03.2013 06:45, schrieb Bastien:
>> Bastien <address@hidden> writes:
>>
>>> This is a problem with Org -- I have a patch for this on my local
>>> branch, but I will push this branch only tomorrow.
>>
>> Applied now, thanks.
>
> I'd like to ask you to revisit that change.  I don't think the question of
> whether #+SETUPFILE should be honored can be decided based on whether the
> buffer is read-only.

I acknowledge this is not the ideal solution but it is better than the
current behavior.

> I'm not entirely sure what Gnus does to trigger that foray into Org
> (a quick glance in the documentation didn't show anything), but if
> anything this indicates that we might need a "safe mode" for Org to
> open untrusted files.

Feel free to propose a better behavior here.

-- 
 Bastien